resident:justin_cohen
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| resident:justin_cohen [2020/08/16 14:18] – [Operative Reports] jonathan | resident:justin_cohen [2020/08/16 19:26] (current) – [Operative Reports] jonathan | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ===== Operative Reports ===== | ===== Operative Reports ===== | ||
| + | General Tips:\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Breast Reduction (Superiomedial Pedicle) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Superiomedial Bilateral Breast Reduction\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was marked preoperatively in the holding area in an upright standing position for anatomic landmarks as well as a wise pattern breast reduction using a standard template. The limbs were made slightly longer to accommodate the superiomedial pedicle.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A near identical procedure was performed on both breasts. All resected tissues were saved and sent to Pathology for routine histologic examination.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A 42mm cookie cutter was used to mark a new ideal nipple areolar complex size. A 9 cm superomedial pedicle was then de-epithelialized using 10 blade. The superomedial pedicle was then dissected away from the surrounding breast tissue down to the chest wall using electrocautery. The nipple was pink and viable during this process. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast and an identical procedure was performed. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The IMF, vertical limbs and periareolar incision were then closed with 3-0 monocryl into the dermis followed by a 4-0 running monocryl intracuticular. A 15F drain was placed into both breasts and secured with a 2-0 nylon at the lateral aspect of the incision. Dermabond was then applied all incisions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Position: | ||
| + | **Prep:** Chloraprep if allergy will use betadine, careful not to rub off surgical site markings \\ | ||
| + | **Draping: | ||
| + | **Medications: | ||
| + | Equipment: 2- ESU machines with smoke evacuators at foot of bed – Settings: 30/30 1-Bair hugger 1- Scale to weigh specimen \\ | ||
| + | **Supplies: | ||
| + | *if specimen >900g will use 15F round drain with 2-0 nylon on PS-2 Sutures: 2-0 vicryl SH X 1 3-0 monocryl PS-2 x6 4-0 monocryl PS-2 X 6 3 skin staplers \\ | ||
| + | **Dressing: | ||
| + | * Have prineo available 6 ABD pads and bra Special Instructions: | ||
| + | * IF oncoplastic reduction WEIGH LUMPECTOMY SPECIMEN PRIOR TO SENDING \\ | ||
| + | * At end of case please provide patient label and specimen weights on card for Dr. Cohen \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Breast Reduction (Inferior Pedicle) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Bilateral Breast Reduction Inferior Pedicle\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was marked preoperatively in the holding area in an upright standing position for anatomic landmarks as well as a wise pattern breast reduction using a standard template.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A near identical procedure was performed on both breasts. All resected tissues were saved and sent to Pathology for routine histologic examination.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A 42mm cookie cutter was used to mark a new ideal nipple areolar complex size. A 8 cm wide inferior pedicle was then de-epithelialized using 10 blade. The inferior pedicle was then dissected away from the surrounding breast tissue down to the chest wall using electrocautery. The nipple was pink and viable during this process. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The IMF, vertical limbs and periareolar incision were then closed with 3-0 monocryl into the dermis followed by a 4-0 running monocryl intracuticular. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Position: | ||
| + | **Prep:** Chloraprep if allergy will use betadine, careful not to rub off surgical site markings \\ | ||
| + | **Draping: | ||
| + | **Medications: | ||
| + | Equipment: 2- ESU machines with smoke evacuators at foot of bed – Settings: 30/30 1-Bair hugger 1- Scale to weigh specimen \\ | ||
| + | **Supplies: | ||
| + | *if specimen >900g will use 15F round drain with 2-0 nylon on PS-2 Sutures: 2-0 vicryl SH X 1 3-0 monocryl PS-2 x6 4-0 monocryl PS-2 X 6 3 skin staplers \\ | ||
| + | **Dressing: | ||
| + | *Have prineo available 6 ABD pads and bra Special Instructions: | ||
| + | * IF oncoplastic reduction WEIGH LUMPECTOMY SPECIMEN PRIOR TO SENDING \\ | ||
| + | *At end of case please provide patient label and specimen weights on card for Dr. Cohen \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Nipple Reconstruction ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Nipple Reconstruction\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position after intubation. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | In the preoperative suite, I marked her nipple location at the meridian and X cm from her sternal notch. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | I then applied bacitracin and placed a protective sponge cap around the nipple. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Augmentation/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Bilateral revision mastopexy/ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was marked preoperatively in the holding area in an upright standing position for anatomic landmarks as well as a wise pattern breast reduction using a standard template. The limbs were made slightly longer to accommodate the shape of new implants.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped with chloroprep and draped in the standard fashion.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A near identical procedure was performed on both breasts.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | We began using the lateral limb of the Wise pattern incision bilaterally to access the submuscular current implant pocket. The capsule was kept intact for the entire procedure whereby we dissected it free from the current pocket in all positions. This was performed with electrocautery and lighted retractor. The entire capsule was then removed and sent to pathology bilaterally. The implants were X implants bilaterally. The left was noted to be intact whereas the right was ruptured. Following removal of the implants the breasts were washed out thoroughly with saline. We then placed a SS sizer into the pocket. The breast was tailor tacked to approximate a wise pattern mastopexy.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A 42mm cookie cutter was used to mark a new ideal nipple areolar complex size since it was too large. The skin was then resected in a wise pattern with careful attention to symmetry. The nipple was pink and viable during this process. The patient was sat in an upright sitting position to assess for size, shape, and symmetry of the breasts. All necessary adjustments were subsequently made to achieve excellent symmetry.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | We elected to choose a SS which was placed into the previous submuscular augmentation pocket as this had the proper dimensions as well as produced the nicest aesthetic result. The pocket was washed out thoroughly and rinsed with betadine. The parenchymal opening was closed with 2-0 vicryl.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The IMF, vertical limbs and periareolar incision were then closed with 3-0 monocryl into the dermis followed by a 4-0 running monocryl intracuticular. Prineo was utilized IMF incisions and dermabond for the rest. The nipples were viable at the end of the procedure and the breasts soft. She was placed into a surgical bra with ABDs. The patient tolerated this procedure without complication, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Latissiumus Flap ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Latissimus dorsi pedicled flap, split thickness skin graft, wound vacuum placement\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was marked in the preoperative area for anatomic landmarks of the latissimus including axillary line lateral border of the muscle posterior superior iliac spine and posterior midline as well as the scapular tip.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the lateral decubitus position. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | An incision was made from the axilla to the back along the axis of the latissimus muscle using a 10 blade scalpel. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Attention was then paid to flap inset. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The wound measured approximately X cm x Xcm. A template was created and then transferred to the thigh and a dermatome set at 12 one thousandth of an inch thickness was used to obtain a STSG. The skin graft was then meshed at 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Wound vac; 15 round blake drains (2 to latissimus donor site and 1 to wound)\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Gynecomastia ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Gynecomastia correction with VASER liposuction\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was marked preoperatively in the holding area in an upright standing position for anatomic landmarks, topography, and breast footprint.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped with chloroprep and draped in the standard fashion.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A near identical procedure was performed on both sides of the chest.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | An 11 blade scalpel was used to make 2 nicks in the skin for access for tumescent. One was in the superolateral and the other in the inferolateral. Each breast was then tumesced using standard tumescent solution and cannula. X cc was placed into each side. Adequate time for hemostasis was allowed. Next skin protectors were placed on the skin and secured with staples. X minutes of VASER energy was added to each side of the chest at 80% power. I alternated between using a 2-ring and 5-ring device to assist with breaking up fibrous tissue and disrupting the fat and breast tissue. Next a 3 mm liposuction cannula was used to thoroughly and symmetrically remove all the excess fat and breast tissue. Cross hatching through the access incisions was performed. Special attention was paid to the retro areolar tissue. Contour irregularities were smoothed out and multiple pinch thickness tests were performed. The patient was also sat up multiple times during the procedure to assess for symmetry and optimal aesthetic outcome. There was a very smooth contoured symmetric male chest at the end of the procedure. Approximately X cc were removed from each side.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The wounds were then closed with interrupted 5-0 fast gut sutures, along with steristrips, | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Gracilis Flap ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Perineal reconstruction with gracilis flap\\ | ||
| + | 2. SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the lithotomy position. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | I began with the gracilis flap harvest. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== V-Y Gluteal Fasciocutaneous Flaps ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Washout and debridement of sacral wound, size 9.5 x 6.5 cm, with removal of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and bone, which was nonviable, bilateral V-Y gluteal fasciocutaneous advancement flaps, size 9.5 x 13.5 cm each, incisional wound VAC placement, 9.5 x 2 cm.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought to the operating room, and general anesthesia was induced per protocol. She was placed prone on the table, and all pressure points were padded. The wound was subsequently prepped and draped in the standard sterile fashion using Betadine. A preoperative timeout was performed to verify the procedure and the patient. The previous nylon sutures in position were removed. The wound was inspected, and it was determined to be a 9.5 x 6.5 cm wound of the sacrum with involvement of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, as well as muscle and bone. All nonviable tissue was debrided sharply, either with scissors or curets. Healthy bleeding tissue was established at all levels with the bone having punctate bleeding, as well as the skin and subcutaneous tissue. A rongeur was also used to debride the bone pieces that were considered to be sharp and potential niduses for pressure points. There did not appear to be any active infection; however, there was some poor vascularized tissue, which was nonviable, and subsequently debrided. The thecal sac of the dura was noted within the wound, and its integrity was maintained throughout the entire case. After all nonviable tissue was removed, pulse lavage with 3 liters of normal saline was performed to irrigate out the previous antibiotic beads, as well as to wash away any extraneous tissue and provide as clean a wound as possible. The wound was examined at this time and deemed appropriate for flap closure. All previously radiated skin was removed at this time, and we felt it would be advantageous to attempt reconstruction.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Two large bilateral V-Y advancement gluteal fasciocutaneous flaps were designed. The total length of these flaps was 9.5 x 13 cm on each side. A 10 blade scalpel was used to create an incision. This was further deepened with electrocautery down to the gluteal muscle over the entire length of the flap. The fascia was incised in order to enable better rotation. Meticulous hemostasis was obtained over the entire area. The flaps were then tested on their mobilization. They did not yet mobilize adequately, and therefore, areas of thick scar tissue were checkerboarded in order to allow for better advancement of the flaps bilaterally. There was noted to be punctate bleeding at the edge of the flap from the dermis and, therefore, even after extensive undermining, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient tolerated the procedure well without complication. She was subsequently brought to the PACU in stable condition after extubation. The size of the wound VAC was 9.5 x 2 cm. The plan for that VAC is for it to remain in position for 7 days. Strict postoperative instructions were provided to the team with regards to positioning and pressure offloading. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ==== Gastrocnemius Flap ==== | ==== Gastrocnemius Flap ==== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 338: | ||
| Operative Report:\\ | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| - | 1. \\ | + | 1. Medial gastrocnemius flap; wound preparation of recipient site approximately X sq cm; split thickness skin graft X sq cm\\ |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| Line 570: | Line 885: | ||
| Learning points/Pimp Questions: | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | Subpectoral tissue expander using alloderm. He says that the breast should be one thumb width apart. That's the cosmetically pleasing position of breast implants. This allows for cleavage, obviously. He uses 2-O vicryl in order to sew in the tissue expander as well as sew the alloderm to the muscle. He then uses 3-0 and 4-0 monocryl in order to close the skin. | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 697: | Line 1013: | ||
| - | ==== Breast Reduction Procedure==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Dr. Cohen Gloves:** 7-blue latex free indicator / 7 - latex free\\ | ||
| - | **Procedure: | ||
| - | **Position: | ||
| - | **Prep:** Chloraprep if allergy will use betadine, careful not to rub off surgical site markings \\ | ||
| - | **Draping: | ||
| - | **Medications: | ||
| - | Equipment: 2- ESU machines with smoke evacuators at foot of bed – Settings: 30/30 1-Bair hugger 1- Scale to weigh specimen \\ | ||
| - | **Supplies: | ||
| - | *if specimen >900g will use 15F round drain with 2-0 nylon on PS-2 Sutures: 2-0 vicryl SH X 1 3-0 monocryl PS-2 x6 4-0 monocryl PS-2 X 6 3 skin staplers \\ | ||
| - | **Dressing: | ||
| - | *Have prineo available 6 ABD pads and bra Special Instructions: | ||
| - | * IF oncoplastic reduction WEIGH LUMPECTOMY SPECIMEN PRIOR TO SENDING \\ | ||
| - | **At end of case please provide patient label and specimen weights on card for Dr. Cohen \\ | ||
| - | ==== Tissue Expander ==== | ||
| - | Subpectoral tissue expander using alloderm. He says that the press should be one thumb width apart that's cosmetically advantageous position of breast implants. This allows for cleavage, obviously. He uses 2-O vicryl in order to sew in the tissue expander as well as sew the alloderm to the muscle. He then uses 3-0 and 4-0 monocryl in order to close the skin. | ||
| ==== Panniculectomy ==== | ==== Panniculectomy ==== | ||
resident/justin_cohen.1597601914.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/16 14:18 by jonathan
