resident:stephanie_malliaris
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| resident:stephanie_malliaris [2020/07/31 14:54] – taylor | resident:stephanie_malliaris [2021/08/19 13:13] (current) – taylor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
| - | ==== Operative Reports ==== | + | Medical School at Tulane - 2003-2007\\ |
| + | Integrated Plastic Surgery at Weill Cornell - 2007-2014\\ | ||
| + | Fellowship in Hand at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) - 2015\\ | ||
| + | Denver Health - 2015 - Forever \\ | ||
| - | ==== Hand ==== | + | [[https:// |
| - | ==== Spaghetti Wrist ==== | ||
| - | The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured with all bony prominences padded and following patient and procedure confirmation, | + | ===== Operative Reports ===== |
| - | + | ||
| - | The arm was exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. | + | General Tips:\\ |
| - | + | \\ | |
| - | The laceration was extended with two oblique incisions in order to gain more proximal access | + | ===== Hand ===== |
| - | + | ||
| - | The injuries were repaired from the radial to ulnar. The proximal muscle belly and tendon | + | ==== Flexor Tendon Repair (Zones 1 and 2) ==== |
| - | + | ||
| - | The microscope was brought into the room and the distal and proximal ulnar neurovascular bundles were identified and the artery and nerve ends were bluntly dissected. The distal and proximal ends of the ulnar artery were clamed and the repaired with 9-0 nylon sutures in a 0-180 fashion repair. At this point, 2 hours had past and the tourniquet was released. The clamps were removed and there was pulsatile flow through the artery. Next, we turned our attention to the ulnar nerve. The nerve was lacerated distal to the branching of the dorsal sensory branch. Both the ulnar nerve and dorsal sensory branch were identified and bluntly dissected under the microscope. The ulnar nerve was repaired with 9-0 nylon epineural sutures taking care to line up the fascicles followed by a 0.5cm diameter nerve wrap. Next, the dorsal sensory branch was repaired with 9-0 nylon epineural sutures taking care to line up the fascicles followed by a 0.5cm diameter nerve wrap. | + | <WRAP group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: | ||
| + | 1. Crush injury | ||
| + | 2. Complete transection of the flexor | ||
| + | finger. | ||
| + | 3. One slip, complete transection of flexor | ||
| + | right long finger. | ||
| + | 4. A 90% transection | ||
| + | 5. | ||
| + | |||
| + | PROCEDURES: | ||
| + | 1. | ||
| + | long, ring, and small fingers. | ||
| + | 2. | ||
| + | 3. | ||
| + | 4. | ||
| + | |||
| + | DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: | ||
| + | remained on the stretcher. | ||
| + | prominences were padded. | ||
| + | given. | ||
| + | and draped in the usual sterile fashion with a tourniquet on the upper arm. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Surgical pause was performed in accordance with hospital regulations. | ||
| + | upper extremity was elevated and exsanguinated using Esmarch bandage and the | ||
| + | tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. We used a Tupper retractor and removed all the | ||
| + | prior placed sutures and investigated the wounds. | ||
| + | A Bruner incision was used to extend the wound proximally and distally, and it was | ||
| + | noted that the neurovascular bundles were grossly intact, but there was complete | ||
| + | disruption of the FDP tendon in zone 2, as well as one of the slips of the FDS | ||
| + | tendons. | ||
| + | The tendon injury was actually more distal, and as such, we opened Bruner wires | ||
| + | distally to the distal phalanx and located the distal end of the tendon through the | ||
| + | A4-A5 area. The remainder of the A4 pulley needed to be opened. | ||
| + | of the tendon was brought through the A2 and A3 area pulleys. | ||
| + | with copious saline and used a 3-0 Supramid to do a modified Kessler repair of the | ||
| + | FDP tendon. | ||
| + | around the tendon. | ||
| + | full flexion. | ||
| + | remained intact and had not been injured in the accident. | ||
| + | and the Bruner flaps were placed over the tendon. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We turned our attention to the index finger. | ||
| + | excisional debridement was performed of skin and subcutaneous tissue. | ||
| + | with scissors, and the area was 3 x 2 cm. We explored the wound and found a 90% | ||
| + | lacerated FDP tendon in zone 1. As there was not much tendon distally, we elected | ||
| + | to repair this with a suture anchor. | ||
| + | 2-0 suture was drilled and placed into the volar aspect of the distal phalanx. | ||
| + | then used the 2-0 suture to repair the tendon to the distal phalanx, and 6-0 Prolene | ||
| + | was then used for further strength repair at the tendon laceration site. This was | ||
| + | then irrigated. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then did the excisional debridement of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the | ||
| + | long finger. | ||
| + | area. The debridement was skin and subcutaneous tissue and it was done with an | ||
| + | Adson. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then turned our attention to the ring and small fingers. | ||
| + | were explored, tendons were intact in the ring finger and in the small finger. | ||
| + | did not extend into the flexor sheath either. | ||
| + | performed, 1 cm x 0.5 cm for of these lacerations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Irrisept wound irrigation system was used, 500 mL to irrigate all four of the | ||
| + | lacerations. | ||
| + | hand and fingers. | ||
| + | interrupted 4-0 nylon sutures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A dorsal blocking splint was placed after bacitracin, Adaptic, and sterile Webril. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Irrigation with Irrisept 500mL | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: Sterile; arm | ||
| + | |||
| + | Drain: None | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sutures: | ||
| + | - Skin: 4-0 nylon | ||
| + | - FDP zone 2: modified Kessler with 3-0 Supramid, epitendinous with 6-0 Prolene | ||
| + | - FDP zone 1: mini Mitek with 2-0 suture was drilled and placed into volar aspect of distal phalanx, 2-0 suture to repair tendon to distal phalanx, 6-0 prolene to reinforce | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dressing: Bacitracin, Adaptic, Webril, dorsal blocking splint\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: FDP/FDS insertions, zones of injury, Camper' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Elevate LUE, splint care, f/u 1-2 weeks, OT referral for flexor rehab protocol\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Attending Pearls (Learning points/Pimp Questions): N/A\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Metacarpal Nail ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Right 5th metacarpal closed reduction and intra-medullary nail internal fixation placement\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The 5th metacarpal fracture was reduced with manual pressure and reduction was confirmed under the c-arm. The appropriate k-wire for the exomed intramedullary nail was placed through the metacarpal head and down the shaft of the fracture. A small incision was made at the metacarpal head to allow placement of the ream and drill. A 40 mm intramedullary nail was chosen. The shaft was reamed and a 40 mm intramedullary nail placed into the shaft. The c-arm was used to confirm that the nail was not in the joint and the joint was also directly inspected. The incision was closed with a 4-0 nylon suture. The patient was dressed with xeroform, 4x8s and webril and placed in an ulnar gutter splint. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Attending Pearls (Learning points/Pimp Questions): | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Dequervain' | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Right First Dorsal Compartment Release | ||
| + | |||
| + | A sterile forearm tourniquet was placed and the arm was exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. We began with the right first dorsal compartment release. A 2 cm transverse incision was made just proximal to the radial styloid over the first compartment. Bipolar electrocautery was used for hemostasis and using blunt dissection with scissors the subcutaneous tissue was dissected longitudinally with care to avoid any injury to neurovascular structures. Extension was then further carried down to the extensor sheaths. Using a scalpel, an incision was made over the tendon sheath over the distal part of the radial styloid. Then the tendon sheath was further bluntly dissected to release any underlying structures or tendons underneath the tendon sheath. The tendon sheath was then opened up proximally and distally, fully releasing the first dorsal compartment. There were no sub-sheaths located within the first compartment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The wound was then irrigated and hemostasis was excellent. The wounds were closed using a 4-0 nylon locking horizontal mattresses were placed in interrupted fashion and a sterile dressing including a plaster volar splint was placed using a Xeroform, 4 x 8 gauze, Webril, bias wrap. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: Sterile forearm tourniquet\\ | ||
| + | Drain: None\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 4-0 nylon locking horizontal mattress\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Plaster volar splint was placed using a Xeroform, 4 x 8 gauze, Webril, bias wrap\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Makes a transverse incision over the 1st dorsal compartment\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care:\\ | ||
| + | Volar plaster splint used to rest thumb\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Attending Pearls (Learning points/Pimp Questions): | ||
| + | Makes a transverse incision over the 1st dorsal compartment\\ | ||
| + | When releasing the tendon sheath should you cut on the volar or dorsal side? Dorsal to prevent volar subluxation that can result in tendon clicking.\\ | ||
| + | There can be multiple sub-sheaths and it is essential to release them all.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Wedge Osteotomy of Metacarpal with ORIF ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | 1. Wedge Osteotomy of Metacarpal with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | OPERATIVE APPROACH: The patient was identified in the preoperative care area where written consent was reviewed with the patients. The surgical site was marked with a marker. All of her questions were answered and concerns were addressed. The patient was brought back to the operating room by the anesthesia staff. All pressure points were well padded. A surgical time-out was performed per protocol, and 2 grams of Ancef were administered prior to the start of the procedure. General anesthesia was then obtained. A nonsterile tourniquet was placed to the appropriate extremity, which was then prepped and draped in a standard sterile fashion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We began by making a curvilinear incision on the radial aspect of the second metacarpal bony prominence, extending the incision proximally and distally to the base and head of the metacarpal, respectively. A tenotomy was used to dissected down through the subcutaneous tissue to the periosteum. Bipolar electrocautery was used to achieve hemostasis. Significant scar tissue was encountered around the malunion segment of the metacarpal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fluoroscopic imaging was used to visualize the second metacarpal and design the wedge osteotomy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Next we drilled a bicortical screw hole most proximal to the fracture site, placed a non-locking screw and confirmed plate placement with fluoroscopic imaging. These steps were repeated to place non-locking, | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Images include dissection down to the malunion, wedge design, more appropriate alignment after wedge resection and lastly plate fixation.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Tourniquet: forearm | ||
| + | Drain: none | ||
| + | Sutures: 4-0 vicryl suture for periosteum/ | ||
| + | Dressing: Xeroform, 4x4 gauze, Volar splint in intrinsic plus | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Metacarpals are triangular in cross-section. The medial and lateral surfaces meet at the volar ridge, providing attachment to the interossei. These attachments together with the intermetacarpal ligaments proximally and distally help splint fractured bones, making functionally significant malunions of the ring and small metacarpals less common.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Significant extra-articular malunions can cause crossing or scissoring of fingers, pain due to distortion of joints, disturbance of muscle/ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Extra-articular malunions associated with shortening can lead to an extension lag proportional to the degree of shortening.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Intra-articular malunion with a significant step (0.5 mm) or gap (1 mm) may cause joint surface incongruity, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care:\\ | ||
| + | Volar splint in intrinsic plus positioning.\\ | ||
| + | If adequate stability is obtained at the time of surgery, remove the postoperative splint 3 to 5 days after surgery and initiate protected motion.\\ | ||
| + | Initiate an early active and active-assisted ROM program.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Know the difference between an open vs closed wedge osteotomy. More commonly done in ortho in relation to the tibia, but concepts can be applied to other long bones as well.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The wedge should be designed to help better align the long bone along its anatomical central axis.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | In the case of an intra-articular malunion, consider a salvage procedure rather than a repositioning osteotomy in the face of arthrosis.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Accurate plate and screw placement is essential. A screw offset of 1 mm can cause as much as 10 degrees of rotation. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | At least three screw holes are need proximal and distal to the osteotomy.\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Palmar Fasciectomy ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | INDICATION: This is a man who had previously been evaluated for Dupuytren' | ||
| + | with the patient. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | OPERATIVE APPROACH: | ||
| + | The patient was identified in the preoperative holding area. Consent was confirmed, the appropriate side was marked as well as the boundaries of the cords. The primary cord was pre-tendinous proximal to the ring finger. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We began our procedure, marking a Brunner' | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then established hemostasis using a bipolar electrocautery. We then, using iris scissors fully excised the pit, which did communicate with the cord. We then irrigated the wound and closed using interrupted 4-0 nylon sutures. We dressed the incision with Xeroform gauze, Webril, and then placed the patient in a resting volar splint. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | FINAL PATHOLOGY: Fibrovascular connect tissue and adipose tissue with focal increased myofibroblasts, | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | *** | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== A1 Trigger Finger Release ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was taken to the operating suite and was placed supine on the operating table. | ||
| + | |||
| + | After adequate anesthetic was given by the anesthesiology team, 4 cc of 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine was injected subcutaneously above the A1 pulley of the three identified digits. The left upper extremity was then prepped and draped in the standard sterile manner. A sterile tourniquet was applied on the forearm. Esmarch was used to exsanguinate the arm and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A 2cm incision was placed in-line with the distal palmar flexion crease over the A1 pulley of the left index finger and a combination of sharp and blunt dissection was performed down to the A1 pulley. The radial and ulnar neurovascular bundles were protected during the duration of the procedure. Then the A1 pulley of the left index finger was divided sharply with a Beaver blade. Full release was achieved in this manner. The flexor tendons were inspected and visualized to be gliding smoothly without bunching or clicking. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This approach was repeated to release the A1 pulleys of the middle and ring finger as well, again with careful dissection down to the A1 pulley, protection of the nerves on either side, and division of the complete A1 pulley. Then the three surgical incisions were copiously irrigated with normal saline and the tourrniquet was released. Then the surgical incisions was closed with interrupted horizontal stitches of 4/0 nylons. Finally, a soft sterile dressing was applied. All counts verified at the end of the case. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Cubital Tunnel Release ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report\\ | ||
| + | 1. Open decompression of right ulnar nerve at elbow, in situ (right cubital tunnel release)\\ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | The patient was transported to Operating Room #4 and remained supine on the gurney with a hand table. A pre-anesthesia time-out was performed. The patient was administered general anesthesia without complication. Pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered. The surgical field was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion with a sterile tourniquet on the proximal upper arm. A final time-out was performed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The planned incision was marked between the medial epicondyle and olecranon, extending 4 cm proximal and 4 cm distal. The limb was exsanguinated with an Esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. The incision was made sharply with a 15 blade scalpel. Dissection was carried down to the subcutaneous tissue and any superficial veins were addressed with bipolar cautery. The medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve was identified and protected. The ulnar nerve was identified just lateral to the medial epicondyle. The intermuscular septum was entered and retracted and the ulnar nerve was dissected free proximally by dividing the septum and the arcade of Struthers. The septum was excised. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The dissection was then turned distally The fibroaponeurotic coverings and cubital tunnel retinaculum were divided. The dissection proceeded through the fascia of the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle. The area was palpated and we confirmed that the ulnar nerve was free from compression with minimal traction. Range of motion of the elbow indicated no subluxation of the nerve over the medial epicondyle. The tourniquet was deflated and hemostasis was obtained. The arm and hand appeared well perfused.The incision was irrigated with normal saline. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 10 ml of 0.25% bupivicaine was injected at the incision site. The skin was closed with buried interrupted deep dermal 3-0 Monocryl suture and a running subcuticular 4-0 Monocryl. The wound was dressed with Xeroform and a bulky soft tissue dressing of gauze, Webril, and bias. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was awaken from anesthesia and transferred to PACU in good condition. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Soft bulky dressing on the elbow to remain in place until follow up. Discharge home. Follow up in Hand Clinic for incision check/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== ORIF Scaphoid, dorsal approach==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The side and site were confirmed and procedure once again. The arm was elevated and exsanguinated using the Esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated at 250 mmHg. The dorsal incision in line with Lister' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Careful dissection was performed down avoiding the veins and the nerves to the extensor retinaculum. This was incised over the third compartment and the EPL tendon was retracted. Once released, we then made a capsular incision longitudinally over the proximal scaphoid. This was incised with a 15 blade and tenotomy scissors were used to complete it, taking care to not injure the carpal bones or SLIL beneath. The wrist joint did not show any signs of acute trauma and it did show what appeared to be a chronic nonunion of the proximal pole. The proximal piece was in mostly 1 piece and the fracture site was identified and inspected. The intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to examine this. The alignment was appropriate. A dental pick was used to remove the fibrous tissue from either end of the scaphoid fracture. Due to the chronic nature of this, we did elect to do a bone graft for this fracture and we used an osteotome to carefully elevate Lister' | ||
| + | The wire was released. The head was confirmed to be buried underneath the cartilage cap of the scaphoid proximal pole. Confirmed the bone graft was still in place and then we took representative final images. We irrigated the wrist joint and then | ||
| + | closed the capsule using a 5-0 PDS suture. We then irrigated once again and repaired with the interrupted 5-0 PDS at again the extensor retinaculum the EPL was not transposed and remained at its native spot. There was plenty of room with the extensor retinacular repair and we then used a 4-0 Monocryl for deep dermal and running skin closure of the incision. Xeroform, 4 x 8s, Webril and a thumb spica splint were placed for the patient.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Yes/No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: \\ | ||
| + | Dressing:\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Resident Notes:\\ | ||
| + | Approach dorsally for proximal pole injuries.\\ | ||
| + | 3-4 approach through extensor compartments.\\ | ||
| + | Before boring, advance the wire through the trapezium.\\ | ||
| + | Two screws are better than one if you can fit them.\\ | ||
| + | Consider a de-torsion wire before placing the screw.\\ | ||
| + | Avoid injuring the SLIL ligament -- a pimp question.\\ | ||
| + | Repair the capsule, repair lister' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: | ||
| + | Ibuprofen/ | ||
| + | Transition to thumb spica cast in 2 weeks\\ | ||
| + | Cast for 3 months\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Spaghetti Wrist ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured with all bony prominences padded and following patient and procedure confirmation, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The arm was exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The laceration was extended with two oblique incisions in order to gain more proximal access to the ulnar nerve and more distal access to the flexor tendons as they were entering the carpal tunnel. The wound was explored and the flexor tendons to the index finger was intact as well as the median nerve. The more ulnar sided structures had obvious injuries. Flexor carpi radialis has a 5% partial laceration. Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) of the long finger was lacerated, but the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) was intact. The ring and small fingers had both FDS and FDP lacerated. The ulnar nerve was lacerated distal to takeoff of the dorsal sensory branch. Flexor carpi ulnaris was lacerated. The wrist and fingers were flexed in order to provide a tensionless repair of the tendons, nerves and artery.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The injuries were repaired from the radial to ulnar. The proximal muscle belly and tendon of FDS of the long finger was dissected bluntly and matched to the distal tendon. This was repaired with a 3-0 supramid using a modified kessler 4 strand repair. Next, the proximal muscle belly and tendon of FDP of the ring finger was dissected bluntly and matched to the distal tendon. This was repaired with a 3-0 supramid using a modified kessler 4 strand repair. Next, the proximal muscle belly and tendon of FDS of the ring finger was dissected bluntly and matched to the distal tendon. This was repaired with a 3-0 supramid using a modified kessler 4 strand repair. Next, the proximal muscle belly and tendon of FDP of the small finger was dissected bluntly and matched to the distal tendon. This was repaired with a 3-0 supramid using a modified kessler 4 strand repair. Next, the proximal muscle belly and tendon of FDS of the small finger was dissected bluntly and matched to the distal tendon. This was repaired with a 3-0 supramid using a modified kessler 4 strand repair.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The microscope was brought into the room and the distal and proximal ulnar neurovascular bundles were identified and the artery and nerve ends were bluntly dissected. The distal and proximal ends of the ulnar artery were clamed and the repaired with 9-0 nylon sutures in a 0-180 fashion repair. At this point, 2 hours had past and the tourniquet was released. The clamps were removed and there was pulsatile flow through the artery. Next, we turned our attention to the ulnar nerve. The nerve was lacerated distal to the branching of the dorsal sensory branch. Both the ulnar nerve and dorsal sensory branch were identified and bluntly dissected under the microscope. The ulnar nerve was repaired with 9-0 nylon epineural sutures taking care to line up the fascicles followed by a 0.5cm diameter nerve wrap. Next, the dorsal sensory branch was repaired with 9-0 nylon epineural sutures taking care to line up the fascicles followed by a 0.5cm diameter nerve wrap.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| Finally, the microscope was removed and flexor carpi ulnaris proximal and distal tendons were identified and the ends bluntly dissected free. Flexor carpi ulnaris was repaired with a 3-0 supramid using a modified kessler 4 strand repair followed by a figure of 8 repair with a 4-0 fiberwire. The incision was closed with 4-0 nylon simple interrupted sutures. Xeroform, 8x8 were applied followed by a dorsal extension blocking splint with the wrist and the fingers in flexion. | Finally, the microscope was removed and flexor carpi ulnaris proximal and distal tendons were identified and the ends bluntly dissected free. Flexor carpi ulnaris was repaired with a 3-0 supramid using a modified kessler 4 strand repair followed by a figure of 8 repair with a 4-0 fiberwire. The incision was closed with 4-0 nylon simple interrupted sutures. Xeroform, 8x8 were applied followed by a dorsal extension blocking splint with the wrist and the fingers in flexion. | ||
| - | Note about wrist flexors. Since the cross the elbow, the elbow should be immobilized as well in 90 degrees when you make the splint.\\ | + | </ |
| - | FDS flexors go through the carpal tunnel like spiderman.\\ | + | |
| - | ==== LRTI ==== | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: @ORLAT@ | + | Photos\\ |
| - | POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: same, *** and trapezoid-scaphoid arthritis | + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ |
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| - | PROCEDURE PERFORMED: | + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ |
| - | 1. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition | + | |
| - | *** 2. Partial trapezoid excision | + | |
| - | Surgeon: @ORSURROLE@ | + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, |
| - | Assistants: @ME@ | + | Learning points/Pimp Questions:\\ |
| + | Note about wrist flexors. Since the cross the elbow, the elbow should be immobilized as well in 90 degrees when you make the splint.\\ | ||
| + | FDS flexors go through the carpal tunnel like spiderman.\\ | ||
| - | Anesthesia: @ORANEST@ | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| - | EBL: minimal | ||
| - | Indications for Procedure: This is a @AGE@ @SEX@ who presented to clinic with @ORLAT@ hand pain. @HE@ had @ORLAT@ thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. | ||
| - | We discussed the nature and pathophysiology of the diagnosis. We discussed treatment options and expectations in regards to potential outcomes, including the need for secondary procedures or revisions. | + | ==== Trapeziectomy LRTI ==== |
| - | Consent was obtained by discussion with the patient in regards to the risks and benefits, including possible injury to the nerve, vessel, tendon, the need for secondary or revision procedures and occupational therapy. The patient had adequate time for discussion and all questions were answered to the patient' | + | <WRAP group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | Complications: None | + | Operative Report:\\ |
| + | 1. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition\\ | ||
| + | 2. Partial trapezoid excision\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Consent: possible injury to the nerve, vessel, tendon, the need for secondary or revision procedures and occupational therapy. The patient had adequate time for discussion and all questions were answered to the patient' | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Operative Procedure: The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured with all bony prominences padded and following patient and procedure confirmation, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The arm was exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. A Wagner longitudinal incision at the junction of the glabrous skin was made over the carpometacarpal joint, curving at the proximal wrist and stopping at the crossing of the flexor carpi radialis tendon. The incision was completed down to the subcutaneous tissue. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The flexor carpi radialis position was marked about 10 cm from the proximal wrist crease. | ||
| - | Operative Findings: Arthritic trapezium, suspension arthroplasty with ligament reconstruction | + | Using a burr drill bit, the volar aspect of the base of the thumb metacarpal was burred down to cortical bone. Then a position onto the more dorsal aspect of the thumb base, the position for the Mitek anchor suture was chosen |
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The capsule edges were re-approximated with 3-0 vicryl sutures. The tourniquet was deflated and hemostasis was obtained and the incision irrigated. The incision was closed with 4-0 nylon simple and horizontal mattress sutures. The incision was dressed with xeroform, 4x8 gauze and a thumb spica splint was applied.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| - | Operative Procedure: The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured with all bony prominences padded and following patient and procedure confirmation, | + | </ |
| - | The arm was exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. A Wagner longitudinal incision at the junction of the glabrous skin was made over the carpometacarpal joint, curving at the proximal wrist and stopping at the crossing of the flexor carpi radialis tendon. The incision was completed down to the subcutaneous tissue. | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | CMC joint was identified and care was taken to avoid injury to the tendon. | + | |
| - | The flexor carpi radialis position was marked about 10 cm from the proximal wrist crease. | + | Photos\\ |
| - | Using a burr drill bit, the volar aspect | + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ |
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| - | The capsule edges were re-approximated with 3-0 vicryl sutures. The tourniquet was deflated and hemostasis was obtained and the incision irrigated. The incision was closed with 4-0 nylon simple and horizontal mattress sutures. The incision was dressed with xeroform, 4x8 gauze and a thumb spica splint was applied. | + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ |
| - | Dr. Malliaris was present for the entirety of the case. The patient tolerated the procedure well and was subsequently extubated and brought to the PACU in stable condition. | + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, |
| - | Post-Operative Plan: The patient extubated and stable to PACU. Discharge home with thumb spica. | + | Learning points/Pimp Questions:\\ |
| + | There are many ways to perform the suspension of the 1st metacarpal, although there is no clear data to show that it is truly vital. The most important part is the thumb spica for 6 weeks-3 months for it to heal.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | When to perform APL/EPB tenodesis? To prevent hyperextension of the MCP joint.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ==== Distal Radius ORIF ==== | ==== Distal Radius ORIF ==== | ||
| - | Operative Procedure: The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured and following patient and procedure confirmation, | + | <WRAP group> |
| - | + | <WRAP half column> | |
| - | The arm was elevated and exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. An 8 cm incision was made over the flexor carpi radialis flexor tendon. The incision was continued down to the FCR sheath and the bipolar was used to achieve hemostasis of small vessels. The FCR sheath was incised and the FCR tendon retracted. The radial artery was identified and retracted radially. The antebrachial fascia was incised. Next, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The fracture was freed with the dental pick and the freer elevator. The fracture still had some mobility. Once all the fragments were free, the mini fluoroscopy was brought in and the fracture reduced with traction and dorsal pressure; we confirmed the reduction with multiple views. The regular *** Acumed volar distal radius plate was chosen as the best size match. The plate was secured with ***proximal (?distal) k-wires and fluoroscopy was used to confirm placement; the *** distal radial screw was placed using a locking screw. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We then turned our attention to the shaft and placed the oblong screw, keeping this a bit loose, and removed the K wires. The radial styloid fragment was then reduced further, and another K wire was used to hold the ulnar two fragments. We then placed the ulnar distal locking screw followed by the remaining distal row, and then the distal most radial styloid screw. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We reduced the fragments to achieve more volar tilt and tightened the shaft screw, and then placed two more shaft screws. Final fluoroscopy images were taken confirming reduction and plate placement. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The pronator quadratus fascia was closed with 4-0 vicryl, achieving almost complete plate coverage. The skin was closed with 4-0 nylon locking horizontal mattress sutures. Xeroform was placed over the incision and a volar resting splint was placed with the MCP joints free. | + | |
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | The arm was elevated and exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. An 8 cm incision was made over the flexor carpi radialis flexor tendon. The incision was continued down to the FCR sheath and the bipolar was used to achieve hemostasis of small vessels. The FCR sheath was incised and the FCR tendon retracted. The radial artery was identified and retracted radially. The antebrachial fascia was incised. Next, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The fracture was freed with the dental pick and the freer elevator. The fracture still had some mobility. Once all the fragments were free, the mini fluoroscopy was brought in and the fracture reduced with traction and dorsal pressure; we confirmed the reduction with multiple views. The regular Acumed volar distal radius plate was chosen as the best size match. The plate was secured with proximal (vs. distal) k-wires and fluoroscopy was used to confirm placement; the distal radial screw was placed using a locking screw. \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | We then turned our attention to the shaft and placed the oblong screw, keeping this a bit loose, and removed the K wires. The radial styloid fragment was then reduced further, and another K wire was used to hold the ulnar two fragments. We then placed the ulnar distal locking screw followed by the remaining distal row, and then the distal most radial styloid screw.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | We reduced the fragments to achieve more volar tilt and tightened the shaft screw, and then placed two more shaft screws. Final fluoroscopy images were taken confirming reduction and plate placement.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The pronator quadratus fascia was closed with 4-0 vicryl, achieving almost complete plate coverage. The skin was closed with 4-0 nylon locking horizontal mattress sutures. Xeroform was placed over the incision and a volar resting splint was placed with the MCP joints free.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| The incision was irrigated and then closed with 4-0 nylon locking horizontal mattress sutures. The incision was dressed with xeroform and a soft dressing of 4x4 gauze, webril and a volar resting splint. The tourniquet was released and normal perfusion returned to the hand. | The incision was irrigated and then closed with 4-0 nylon locking horizontal mattress sutures. The incision was dressed with xeroform and a soft dressing of 4x4 gauze, webril and a volar resting splint. The tourniquet was released and normal perfusion returned to the hand. | ||
| - | Dr. Malliaris was present for the entirety | + | </ |
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ==== Carpal Tunnel Release ==== | ==== Carpal Tunnel Release ==== | ||
| - | Operative Pearls | + | <WRAP group> |
| - | Anatomy | + | <WRAP half column> |
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured and following patient and procedure confirmation, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Local anesthesia of 6 ccs of 50:50 1% lidocaine and 0.25% marcaine was injected into the volar wrist in line with the 3rd webspace. A tourniquet was placed sterilely and the forearm and hand were exsanguinated with an esmarch bandage and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A 2 cm incision was made over the volar wrist in line with the 3rd webspace. The fat overlying the superficial palmar fascia was excised with the scapel. Retractors were used to visualize the superficial palmar fascia and we encountered origins of the thenar musculature. The superficial palmar fascia was excised ulnar to the muscle insertions. At the level of the transverse carpal ligament, we also encountered hypothernar musculature origins. Retractors were placed deeper into the incision and the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) was excised with the beaver blade to reveal the median nerve. Ragnell scissors were used to spread above the TCL distally and a freer elevator was used to free the nerve off the TCL. Then the TCL was cut until a small fat pad was visualized and the nerve was released. Next we turned our attention to the proximal aspect of the TCL. We again spread with the ragnell scissors above the TCL and freed the nerve from the TCL with the freer. The TCL was cut with the ragnell scissors and then slid through the antebrachial fascia to release the median nerve.The tourniquet was deflated to reveal the median nerve with constriction and hyperemia. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| Technical Steps | Technical Steps | ||
| Line 104: | Line 543: | ||
| 11. Ensure complete release with the freer.\\ | 11. Ensure complete release with the freer.\\ | ||
| 12. Close with 4-0 nylon. She prefers locked horizontal mattress sutures.\\ | 12. Close with 4-0 nylon. She prefers locked horizontal mattress sutures.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| Postoperative Care | Postoperative Care | ||
| Line 110: | Line 556: | ||
| No Narcotics\\ | No Narcotics\\ | ||
| - | Operative Procedure: The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured and following patient and procedure confirmation, | + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: Has been known to ask brachial plexus questions to interns |
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| - | Local anesthesia of 6 ccs of 50:50 1% lidocaine | + | ====ORIF Metacarpal Fractures==== |
| - | + | ||
| - | A 2 cm incision was made over the volar wrist in line with the 3rd webspace. The fat overlying | + | <WRAP group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | The patient was identified in the preoperative care area where informed consent was reviewed with the patients. The surgical site was marked, all of their questions were answered | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | An incision was made over the right fifth metacarpal | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | An olive threaded K wire was used to secure one end of the plate, and the second hole on the other end was drilled | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A fourth proximal screw was then placed through | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The incision | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Postoperative Plan: \\ | ||
| + | - He will be discharged home when he meets PACU criteria. | ||
| + | - Follow up in Hand Clinic as scheduled \\ | ||
| + | - 24 Hours of Keflex post-op \\ | ||
| + | - NWB RUE \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Thumb UCL Repair==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Repair of left thumb ulnar collateral ligament | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was taken to the operating room. The patient was sedated. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | A 4 cm lazy S type incision was outlined on the ulnar aspect of the left thumb over the MCP joint. The forearm was exsanguinated and the forearm tourniquet was turned on. The marked incision was made just through the skin. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: forearm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: none\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: Joint capsule 3-0 vicryl, skin monocryl or nylon\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Xeroform, gauze, cast padding and Thumb Spica Splint\\ | ||
| + | Special Equipment: Labral tape as an internal brace, ARTHREX DX SwiveLock SL, with Forked Eyelet, 3.5 x 8.5 mm (Bone Anchor)\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Steps Summary: | ||
| + | - Reverse Lazy s over ulnar side | ||
| + | - Gentle cut | ||
| + | - *Avoid dorsal radial sensory | ||
| + | - Expose joint capsule using scissors | ||
| + | - Open joint capsule | ||
| + | - Separate from the adductor aponeurosis using freer | ||
| + | - Open adductor aponeurosis sharply | ||
| + | - Expose ucl. Identify ends. Try to separate out. | ||
| + | - Using k wire and Fluoro identify distal anchor point | ||
| + | - Drill hole | ||
| + | - Put in anchor with tape and suture | ||
| + | - Suture in to proximal ucl | ||
| + | - Identify proximal area and place k wire | ||
| + | - Drill over k wire | ||
| + | - Screw in tape | ||
| + | - Close joint calsule | ||
| + | - Close aponeurosis with running 4-0 vicryl | ||
| + | - Close skin with locking horizontal mattress with 4-0 nylon | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Proper collateral: from fossa in metacarpal neck, dorsal to axis of rotation to lateral and volar aspect of base of proximal phalanx\\ | ||
| + | accessory collateral: from palmar aspect of metacarpal neck into volar plate and sesamoid\\ | ||
| + | Most tears are at site of insertion\\ | ||
| + | Adductor sheath can entrap: stener lesion \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Postoperative Plan: \\ | ||
| + | Non weight bearing on this hand x 6 weeks.\\ | ||
| + | Thumb spica splint to kept on and dry at all times. \\ | ||
| + | At clinic follow-up visit will transition to thumb spica cast; no suture removal needed.\\ | ||
| + | Pt will have thumb immobilized for a minimum of six weeks.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | Mechanism of injury - radially-directed force causing hyper-abduction moment at the thumb MCP (ie a ski pole if acute)\\ | ||
| + | Acute injury - eponym is Skier' | ||
| + | Chronic injury - eponym is Gamekeeper' | ||
| + | Stener lesion - avulsed ligament with or without bony attachment is displaced dorsal and superficial to the adductor aponeurosis. | ||
| + | Usually the distal end is retracted proximally\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====Abdominally based random pattern skin flap==== | ||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Operative Report: \\ | ||
| + | 1. Abdominally-based random pattern skin flap, 10 cm by 10 cm, for coverage of right dorsal hand shearing degloving injury. \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Care of the patient was assumed from Dr. Ipaktchi and the Ortho Hand team following revision amputation of the right index finger and fillet of finger flap to resurface the dorsal aspects of the long finger and remaining index finger. The wound now measured 10 cm by 8 cm to the dorsal hand with some exposure of the bases of the proximal phalanges of the index and long fingers.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | We began by templating the defect onto a piece of Esmarch bandage as a random-pattern inferiorly-based " | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The superior, medial, and lateral flap margins were incised with a 10-blade scalpel. Dissection was carried through the subcutaneous tissues using Bovie electrocautery. The flap was raised from superior to inferior. Laterally where the tissue was thinner, dissection was carried above the external oblique fascia. Medially where the tissue was thicker, dissection was carried below the superficial fascial system, leaving some fat down on the abdominal wall. Adequate hemostasis was obtained.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | After first ensuring that the flap was of adequate width and length to resurface the right dorsal hand, we began closure of the donor site. The subcutaneous tissue was undermined for several centimeters in each direction for mobilization. The superior corners of the defect were closed with 3-0 Vicryl for the SFS and simple interrupted 3-0 Nylon sutures for approximately 5 cm each. The inferolateral edges were brought together and closed for approximately 4 cm using 3-0 Nylon suture. This left a triangular-shaped defect centrally at the donor site measuring 4 cm by 4 cm.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The flap was then inset to the dorsal hand using simple interrupted 3-0 Nylon suture, with the lateral, superior, and medial edges of the flap well approximated to the proximal, radial, and distal aspects of the dorsal hand, respectively.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The incision sites were dressed with bacitracin ointment. The triangular-shaped defect was dressed with wet-to-dry 4x4 gauze. The raw surface of the flap at the base was dressed with wet-to-dry 4x4 gauze. A split ABD pad was placed over the abdomen and under the hand. The hand was wrapped in Burn gauze and Kerlix.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The forearm and upper arm abrasions were dressed with bacitracin ointment, Xeroform, and Kerlix.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: \\ | ||
| + | - Return to ward. Pediatrics primary.\\ | ||
| + | - Non-weight bearing RUE.\\ | ||
| + | - Ancef x 24 hours post-operatively.\\ | ||
| + | - Abdominal binder at all times to keep hand in place.\\ | ||
| + | - Okay to gently range at elbow and shoulder, keeping hand in place.\\ | ||
| + | - NO flap checks necessary.\\ | ||
| + | - Plan for dressing change in OR with Dr. Ipaktchi on Monday, 7/20/20. Otherwise no dressing changes. Okay to re-inforce with 4x4 gauze or ABD pads, gently tucking at inferior aspect, if needed.\\ | ||
| + | - Ultimately will follow up with Hand/ | ||
| + | - Plastics to continue to follow.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Upper Extremity GSW Re-Exploration, | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Left upper extremity previous gunshot wound exploration\\ | ||
| + | 2. Neurolysis of left median nerve injury at the level of the elbow, near the level of the brachial artery bifurcation and medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury, excision of neuromas at both nerves\\ | ||
| + | 3. Repair of left median nerve injury at the level of the elbow - 7 cm segment reconstructed with 4-5 mm allograft, 70 mm length using microsurgical technique\\ | ||
| + | 4. Repair of left medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury - 6.5 cm segment reconstructed with 1-2 mm allograft, 65 mm in length using microsurgical technique\\ | ||
| + | 5. Scar revision, distal, volar scar 4 x 1 cm, with simple closure\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: The patient is a _-year old male with a history of gunshot wound to the left upper extremity with previous history of operative exploration, | ||
| + | |||
| + | DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was transported to Operating Room #4 and placed supine on the table with pressure points appropriately padded. A pre-anesthesia time-out was performed. The patient was administered anesthesia without complication. Pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered - Ancef. The surgical field was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A final time-out was performed. Anti-embolic compression devices were placed on bilateral lower extremities prior to induction. A Foley catheter was placed and removed at the end of the case. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient' | ||
| + | |||
| + | We began by marking out an incision over the previous incision line. We also included an ellipse of tissue 4 x 1 cm distally, which was one of the previous gunshot wound sites that had persistent granulation tissue that had not been completely epithelialized. We then carefully made the incision over the remainder of the previous incision site, and encountered a significant amount of scar. We meticulously dissected this down to the level of the pronator teres and biceps brachii. We were able to identify the median nerve proximal to the elbow, and carried this dissection down distally. Near the elbow, we encountered the previous brachial artery repair/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The arm was once again exsanguinated with an Esmarch and tourniquet inflated to 250 mmHg. The remainder of the neurolysis was performed with microsurgical technique, and excision of neuromas and preparation of the nerves with a fresh edge was performed with a #10 blade. Once the nerves were adequately prepared, the median nerve was repaired with a 4-5 mm allograft, 70 mm in length. Simple interrupted 8-0 Nylon sutures were placed into the epineurium for a tension free coaptation. Tisseel fibrin glue was then applied to the proximal and distal repair sites circumferentially. Attention was then directed towards medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve repair, which was performed in a similar fashion. Once the nerve was adequately prepared, it was repaired with a 1-2 mm allograft, 65 mm in length. Simple interrupted 8-0 Nylon sutures were placed into the epineurium for a tension free coaptation. Tisseel fibrin glue was then applied to the proximal and distal repair sites circumferentially. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The arm was then cleansed, tourniquet was released. Meticulous hemostasis was secured with Bipolar cautery. The artery was visualized and found to be intact throughout its course. The hand was warm and well perfused with capillary refill 2-3 seconds on all digits. The nerve repairs were visualized and appeared to be tension free with adequate coaptation. Therefore, the wound was irrigated until this ran clear, and the skin was closed with 4-0 Nylon horizontal mattress sutures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The skin was then cleansed and the wound was dressed with Xeroform gauze, then 4x4 gauze, then Webril, and posterior arm plaster splint, with the wrist in neutral, and Bias. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Enchondroma Curettage ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Left index finger middle phalanx mass (findings consistent with enchondroma) curettage and bone grafting \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was transported to Operating Room #4 and placed supine on the table with pressure points appropriately padded. A pre-anesthesia time-out was performed. Left upper arm tourniquet was placed. The patient was administered anesthesia without complication. Pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered. The surgical field was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A final time-out was performed. Anti-embolic compression devices were placed on bilateral lower extremities prior to induction. No Foley catheter was placed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A radial midlateral incision was planned over the middle phalanx. The left upper extremity was then exsanguinated with tourniquet at 250 mmHg. Incision was then made and meticulous dissection occurred until we reached the radial aspect of the periosteum overlying the middle phalanx. This was then probed with a freer until a soft spot was reached. Once this was identified, a longitudinal incision was then made with a beaver blade into the radial aspect of the middle phalanx. Once the cortex was penetrated, there was, what appeared to be cartilaginous material encountered. This was carefully curetted and a specimen was sent to pathology. While awaiting preliminary pathology, the remainder of the material was removed, within the confines of the middle phalanx cortex. This was performed in conjunction with review of the MRI as well as with intraoperative fluoroscopy, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The tourniquet was released at the end of the case and all digits had good capillary refill afterwards, brisk, 2-3 seconds, and were warm and pink. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was awoken from anesthesia and transferred to the PACU in good condition with no apparent complications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: Forearm tourniquet\\ | ||
| + | Drain: none\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 5-0 Nylon\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: xeroform, 4x4 gauze, well padded radial gutter plaster splint\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: | ||
| + | Enchondroma most commonly arises in the proximal phalanx or metacarpal when seen in the hand. It can be seen in metaphyseal and epiphyseal regions and is typically confined to the bone. The enchondroma may distend the bone and pathologic fracture may be seen.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Bulky protective dressings are applied and range of motion is initiated at the first dressing change, usually 8 to 10 days postoperatively.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Periodic surveillance continues for 3 to 5 years.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Make the bone window to the lesion two-thirds the greatest dimension of the lesion to allow adequate visualization of the cavity.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Phalanx enchondromas can just have a bulky dressing, but metacarpal fractures usually require splinting for 6 weeks.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | These lesions are similar to giant cell tumors. Remember that these can recur late and metastasize.\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ===== Plastics ===== | ===== Plastics ===== | ||
| + | ==== Tissue Expander (Total Submuscular) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Total Submuscular Tissue Expander Placement | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the preoperative area, consent was acquired, and the patient' | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Following completion of the mastectomy, the reconstruction portion of the case commenced. A left subpectoral pocket was created. The pectoralis major muscle was released and the inferior and lateral portion of the pocket was raised beneath the serratus anterior muscle creating a inferolateral muscle flap and rectus abdominus fascia elevated inferiorly.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | This was repeated on the right side, with the same pectoralis and serratus anterior and rectus fascia flaps were elevated.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The pockets were copiously irrigated with normal saline and hemostasis was ensured. The base diameter was measured intra-operatively and confirmed to accommodate a 12 cm base width tissue expander bilaterally. A 15 french round blake drain was placed at this time and secured, exiting inferolaterally in each side.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The pockets were again irrigated with normal saline, and hemostasis again confirmed. They were then copiously irrigated with antibiotic containing normal saline. The skin and subpectoral pocket were cleansed with diluted betadine and gloves were changed. Using a minimal-touch technique, the above tissue expanders were placed into the subpectoral submuscular pockets. They were secured in place with 2-0 PDS suture through 4 of the 6 tabs. The pectoralis and serratus flaps were subsequently approximated using interrupted 3-0 vicryl sutures. \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The skin at the incisions of the NSM were closed with 3-0 monocryl interrupted deep dermal sutures and a subcuticular running suture of 4-0 monocryl. The skin incisions were then covered in surgical skin glue. The patient tolerated the procedure well and without complication. She was transferred to the postoperative care unit if stable condition. All needle and sponge counts were correct at the end of the case. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 french round blake drain x2\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Breast Reduction (Inferior Pedicle)==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | The patient was marked in the preoperative holding area. The new position of the nipple areolar complex was marked and correlated to the level of the inframammary fold along the breast meridians and a Wise pattern was delineated. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The markings were then re-delineated. The nipple-areolar complex was inscribed with a 42 mm cookie cutter and a scalpel was used to incise around the epidermis of the nipple-areolar complex. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Breast Reduction (Superiomedial Pedicle) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Bilateral superior medial pedicle wise pattern skin reduction mammoplasty: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was consented and marked with a wise skin pattern superomedial pedicle breast reduction pattern in the pre op area. The patient was taken to the operating room. A pre time out was performed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Attending Pearls (Learning points/Pimp Questions): | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== MTF Breast Augmentation ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | The patient was seen in the preoperative holding area. The procedure and risks, as listed above, and benefits were again discussed in detail. Preoperative markings were made with the patient in erect position. The planned incision, implant type, location and approximate size were again confirmed with the patient, who understood and agreed with the operative plan. The patient was then taken to the operative suite and placed in supine position. All bony prominences were padded. SCD boots were placed. Arms were placed in 90 degrees of abduction. Perioperative antibiotics were given. A proper timeout was taken, which all present parties were in agreement. General endotracheal anesthesia was administered. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Breasts were dissected simultaneously. An incision was made in the inframammary fold, approximately 6cm inferior from the nipple about 5 cm in length. A plane above the pectoralis muscle was dissected using electrocautery and blunt dissection. This was carried around medially, superiorly and laterally to the preoperative markings of the breast base. Visual and manual inspection of the pocket was performed to ensure a smooth contour, as well as hemostasis. The pocket was irrigated with saline and a 285 mL breast implant sizer was placed into the newly created pocket. This was deemed too large for her frame and a 225ml sizer was placed. This appeared more appropriate to the size the appearance the patient had indicated she wanted. The incisions were temporarily closed with staples and on visual inspection, the sizer seemed to be in a good position and was anatomically pleasing. Final corrections were performed to correct any asymmetry or under-dissection. The patient' | ||
| + | The silicone prosthesis was then opened and bathed in antibiotic solution. The implant was confirmed to be the correct one selected and then inserted into the pre-pectoral space in a minimal touch technique using a funnel. The inferior mammary fold was re-established using 3-0 PDS. The wounds were then closed using interrupted fascial 3-0 PDS, deep dermal interrupted 3-0 Monocryl and a running 4-0 Monocryl. The incisions were then dressed with Steri-Strips followed by Telfa and Tegaderm. Large foam tape was used to secure the breast in appropriate position. Final dressing consisted of a surgical compression bra, which was placed on the patient. The patient was turned over to the anesthesia team and was awakened easily. Overall the patient tolerated the procedure well. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== C-V Nipple Recon ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was taken to the the operating room and following patient and procedure confirmation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Nipple reconstruction was performed using C-V flaps that were marked pre-operatively with the patient standing. The procedure as below, was performed for each breast. An incision was made using a 15-blade along the C-V flap marking. The flap was elevated using a knife. The V components of the flap were then turned inward to create the projected portion of the nipple. These were secured in place using 5-0 Chromic. The C component of the flap was then turned downward to construct the roof of the new nipple. This was secured using 5-0 Chromic suture. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The limbs of the nipple incisions were dressed with steri-strips and Exofin. Bacitracin was applied to each nipple projection. Once the Exofin was dry, nipple guards were secured in place using 4x4 gauze and Tegederms. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ==== FTM Mastectomy ==== | ==== FTM Mastectomy ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| The patient was marked in the pre-operative area and the patient was brought back to the operative suite, placed in supine position. All bony prominences were padded. SCD boots were placed. Perioperative antibiotics were given. A proper timeout was taken, which all present parties were in agreement. The preoperative markings were reinforced and remarked. | The patient was marked in the pre-operative area and the patient was brought back to the operative suite, placed in supine position. All bony prominences were padded. SCD boots were placed. Perioperative antibiotics were given. A proper timeout was taken, which all present parties were in agreement. The preoperative markings were reinforced and remarked. | ||
| Line 135: | Line 1005: | ||
| All counts were correct. Dr. Malliaris was present for the entirety of the case. The patient had pectoralis nerve block performed by anesthesia. The patient was then subsequently extubated and brought to the PACU in stable condition and was discharged home with outpatient followup. | All counts were correct. Dr. Malliaris was present for the entirety of the case. The patient had pectoralis nerve block performed by anesthesia. The patient was then subsequently extubated and brought to the PACU in stable condition and was discharged home with outpatient followup. | ||
| - | Post-Operative Plan: | + | </ |
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-Operative Plan: | ||
| PACU discharge | PACU discharge | ||
| Compression vest | Compression vest | ||
| Line 141: | Line 1024: | ||
| Keep bolster in place | Keep bolster in place | ||
| - | ====ORIF Metacarpal Fractures==== | + | Learning |
| - | Description of Procedure: The patient was identified in the preoperative care area where informed consent was reviewed with the patients. The surgical site was marked, all of their questions were answered and concerns were addressed. The patient was brought back to the operating room by the anesthesia staff. All pressure | + | |
| - | An incision was made over the right fifth metacarpal in a longitudinal incision. | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| - | An olive threaded K wire was used to secure one end of the plate, and the second hole on the other end was drilled and then the appropriate length was determined for bicortical screw, which was placed with good purchase. A second distal screw was placed, angling appropriately in the head of the metacarpal. Orthogonal views were taken to confirm length and placement. Then two proximal shaft screws were placed, and then the olive wire was removed and a third proximal screw was placed. | + | ==== Acell Placement ==== |
| - | A fourth proximal screw was then placed through the plate, followed by a third distal screw. Because of the shape of the fracture, a 1.5mm single dorsal radial lag screw by technique was then placed to further support the construct, and the two middle holes in the plate were left open. | + | <WRAP group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | The incision was irrigated. Using a 4-0 Vicryl, the periosteum | + | Operative Report:\\ |
| + | 1. | ||
| + | 2. Excisional debridement of skin and subcutaneous tissue of left lower extremity wound using scissors/ | ||
| + | 3. Application of Acell micromatrix powder and 3-layer wound matrix covering wound 1225 cm squared.\\ | ||
| + | 4. Application of negative pressure wound therapy, 1225 cm squared.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: The patient is a 24 year old woman with traumatic left lower extremity Morel-Lavallee lesion that has undergone prior washouts and debridements with the trauma surgery team. Plastic Surgery | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was transported to Operating Room #4 and placed supine on the table with pressure points appropriately padded. A pre-anesthesia time-out | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The wound was sharply debrided of necrotic subcutaneous tissue including fat at the anterior medial aspect of the distal thigh and skin/ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | At this time, Acell micromatrix powder | ||
| - | The patient was awakened from anesthesia and taken to PACU in stable condition. | + | </ |
| - | Counts: All surgical scrub counts were correct at the end of the case. | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | Complications: None. | + | Photos\\ |
| + | {{:resident: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| - | Postoperative Plan: | + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ |
| - | - He will be discharged home when he meets PACU criteria. | + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ |
| - | - Follow up in Hand Clinic as scheduled | + | Sutures: List all layers\\ |
| - | - 24 Hours of Keflex post-op | + | Dressing: What's preferred? |
| - | - NWB RUE | + | |
| - | ====Abdominally based random pattern skin flap==== | + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ |
| - | + | ||
| - | PROCEDURES PERFORMED: | + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, |
| - | 1. Abdominally-based random pattern | + | |
| - | + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | |
| - | INDICATIONS FOR PROCEDURE: The patient | + | |
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Sub-pectoral Tissue Expander | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 0. Bilateral Pectoral Block by Regional Anesthesia Team followed by Mastectomies\\ | ||
| + | 1. Bilateral subpectoral tissue expander placement with AlloDerm sling for breast reconstruction.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought to the operating room. Surgical pause was performed in accordance with hospital regulations. Anesthesia was administered and bilateral PEC blocks were placed. Bony prominences were padded and the entire chestand upper abdomen were prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion as well as the arms were secured to the arm board and prepped in the usual fashion as well.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Breast team commenced with their portion of the operation, please see the separate dictation for this.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The breast team had completed the mastectomy and the mastectomy flaps weighed. We began with inspecting the pocket and ensuring excellent hemostasis. We then proceeded to elevate the pectoralis major from the pectoralis minor and serratus. This was done in a relatively avascular plane and there was minimal bleeding. We closed a portion of the lateral side of the breast using interrupted 3-0 PDS sutures. We then measured the area under the muscle to determine optimal tissue expander size. Her base width was measured bilterally. We then identified the IMF and placed a pre-cut, pre-pie-crusted appropriately sized piece of alloderm at this position using a running 3-0 PDS suture. A 15fr drain was placed and secured out the lateral IMF. We then irrigated and again ensured excellent hemostasis. The breast pocket was then irrigated using triple antibiotic solution. We used betadine to re-prep the chest wall skin. Using provided needle the air was removed from the tissue expanders and they were filled with 100cc of normal saline colored slightly with methylene blue. All providers then changed gloves. The tissue expanders were soaked in triple antibiotic and then placed into the chest with minimal touching. At least 4 tabs were sutured into place with 3-0 PDS. Then the alloderm was closed to the pectoralis major using a running 3-0 PDS. The incisions were closed using 3-0 and 4-0 monocryl and dressed with steri strips with telfa and tegaderm. A compression vest was placed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: none\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15Fr drain\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: TE Tabs with 3-0 PDS, Skin with 3-0/4-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Doesn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: \\ | ||
| + | Breast Blood Supply: | ||
| + | - Perforating branches of internal mammary artery Lateral thoracic artery | ||
| + | - Thoracodorsal artery | ||
| + | - Intercostal perforators | ||
| + | - Thoracoacromial artery | ||
| + | - Venous drainage mirrors arterial supply and predominantly to the axilla | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Know the " | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The pectoralis major muscle has sternocostal, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Post-Operative Plan: \\ | ||
| + | Can dc home or stay the night; admit to breast team\\ | ||
| + | Ancef x3 doses while in house, keflex on discharge for 10 days or until drains removed.\\ | ||
| + | Continuous wearing | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The NAC is innervated by the anterolateral branch of the fourth intercostal nerve. | ||
| + | * Supernumerary nipples and breasts can occur anywhere along the milk line from the axilla to the groin. | ||
| + | * Attenuation of Cooper’s ligaments leads to ptosis and increased breast mobility. | ||
| + | * The IMF is an important structure to preserve. Violation can be difficult to correct. | ||
| + | * Injury to the intercostobrachial nerve results in paresthesias or anesthesia of the upper medial arm. | ||
| + | * Perfect symmetry is rare. | ||
| + | * Medial cleavage is difficult to create if it does not exist in the native breast. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Pre-Pectoral Tissue Expander Placement ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 0. Bilateral Pectoral Block by Regional Anesthesia Team followed by Mastectomies\\ | ||
| + | 1. Bilateral pre-pectoral tissue expander placement with AlloDerm sling for breast reconstruction.\\ | ||
| + | 2. Use of the endoscope indocyanine green angiography for assessment of flap perfusion.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought to the operating room. Surgical pause was performed | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Breast team commenced with their portion of the operation, please see the separate dictation for this.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Once the sentinel lymph node and bilateral mastectomies were performed, we commenced our portion of the operation. The right breast specimen was approximately 602 grams and the left breast was approximately 498 grams. We irrigated both pockets with copious sterile saline, ensured hemostasis, and assessed the skin flaps. We closed down the right breast lateral portion with 2-0 PDS interrupted sutures sequentially in order to recreate the anterior axillary line. We then repeated this in the left breast pocket, again with a 2-0 PDS. The IMF was still for the most part intact.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | On the skin flaps there was some subcutaneous tissue | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | At this point, we elected not to proceed with a direct implant, but rather to use a tissue expander only filled part of the way, but still placed this prepectorally | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The chosen tissue expanders were the 133SX-14-T 600 mL. I evacuated the air and then put in 350 mL of methylene blue injectable saline to each expander. This was done with clean gloves in the minimal touch technique. I started with the left side, irrigated with copious antibiotic saline.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | We placed 2 drains, inferolaterally, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | We then prepped the skin with Betadine | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The area was cleaned and Exofin glue was placed in each incision. We then placed | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: List all layers\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: What's preferred? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Abdominoplasty/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Panniculectomy with umbilical transposition\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was marked in the pre-operative bay. The inferior incision was marked as well as midline. The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured with all bony prominences padded and following patient and procedure confirmation, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Markings for placement of the umbilicus were made at the level of the ASIS. A 1x2cm incision oval with an inferior chevron was made. The skin was excised with an 11 blade and the subcutaneous tissue defatted. The umbilicus | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The patient was then awakened and transferred to the gurney. An abdominal binder with abd pads was applied. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Drain: 15 french drains x2 secured with 2-0 nylon\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: SFS 2-0 vicryl, 3-0 monocryl deep dermals and 3-0 v-lok\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Surgical Glue, ABDs, Compression Binder\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed\\Post-operative care: Include restrictions, | ||
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: The markings in pre-op while upright are very important. It's hard to redo them once on the table supine.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post op restrictions: | ||
| + | Keep slightly bent at hips\\ | ||
| + | Walk regularly but no strenuous activity\\ | ||
| + | Wear binder at all times\\ | ||
| + | Monitor and record drain output daily.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Mangled Hand ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: | ||
| + | 1. Right mangled hand, crush injury | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: | ||
| + | 1. Right mangled hand, crush injury involving: index finger, long finger, ring finger, small finger, palm, dorsum of hand | ||
| + | 2. Zone 2 crush injury, multilevel degloving, avulsion, extensive soft tissue damage, dorsal and volar to index finger, long finger, ring finger, small finger, palm, dorsum of hand (Zone VI), with near complete amputation of index finger, long finger, ring finger, small finger | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | PROCEDURES PERFORMED: | ||
| + | 1. Evaluation of right mangled hand, crush injury under anesthesia | ||
| + | 2. Revision amputation | ||
| + | 3. Revision amputation of the right long finger | ||
| + | 4. Revision amputation | ||
| + | 5. Revision amputation of the small finger just distal to the MCP joint (base of proximal phalanx preserved), with ulnar-based V-Y closure\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient | ||
| - | DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: Care of the patient | + | A sterile upper extremity tourniquet |
| - | We began by templating | + | We began the procedure |
| - | + | ||
| - | The superior, medial, and lateral flap margins were incised | + | RIGHT HAND: |
| - | + | INDEX FINGER: | |
| - | After first ensuring that the flap was of adequate width and length | + | |
| - | + | (Each finger was evaluated/ | |
| - | The flap was then inset to the dorsal hand using simple interrupted | + | |
| - | + | All amputated digits | |
| - | The incision sites were dressed with bacitracin ointment. The triangular-shaped defect | + | |
| - | + | The patient had a postoperative supraclavicular block by the anesthesiology team. Please see separate documentation for additional details.\\ | |
| - | The forearm and upper arm abrasions were dressed with bacitracin ointment, Xeroform, and Kerlix. | + | The patient was awoken |
| - | + | ||
| - | The patient was awaken | + | </ |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | <WRAP half column> | |
| - | SPECIMEN: None. | + | |
| - | + | Photos:\\ | |
| - | IMPLANTS/ | + | |
| - | + | {{:resident: | |
| - | ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS: 30 mL. | + | {{:resident: |
| - | + | {{:resident: | |
| - | COMPLICATIONS: None. | + | {{:resident: |
| - | + | {{:resident: | |
| - | DISPOSITION: To PACU. | + | {{: |
| - | + | {{: | |
| - | POSTOPERATIVE PLAN: | + | {{: |
| - | - Return to ward. Pediatrics primary. | + | {{: |
| - | - Non-weight bearing RUE. | + | {{: |
| - | - Ancef x 24 hours post-operatively. | + | {{: |
| - | - Abdominal binder at all times to keep hand in place. | + | {{: |
| - | - Okay to gently range at elbow and shoulder, keeping hand in place. | + | \\ |
| - | - NO flap checks necessary. | + | |
| - | - Plan for dressing change in OR with Dr. Ipaktchi on Monday, 7/20/20. Otherwise no dressing changes. Okay to re-inforce | + | Tourniquet: Forearm |
| - | - Ultimately will follow up with Hand/Plastics as outpatient with plan for flap division | + | Drain: None\\ |
| - | - Plastics | + | Sutures: 4-0 Nylon simple interrupted\\ |
| - | + | Dressing: Adaptic | |
| - | ==== ORIF Scaphoid, dorsal approach==== | + | |
| - | *** MRN 20340759 | + | Anatomy: Flexor/ |
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Gentle graduated compression | ||
| + | |||
| + | Attending Pearls (Learning points/Pimp Questions): Assess viability of tissue and then assess structure-by-structure or spare parts. Bony fixation/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
resident/stephanie_malliaris.1596221675.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/07/31 14:54 by taylor
