resident:stephanie_malliaris
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| resident:stephanie_malliaris [2021/02/03 00:55] – [Enchondroma Curettage] jonathan | resident:stephanie_malliaris [2021/08/19 13:13] (current) – taylor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Integrated Plastic Surgery at Weill Cornell - 2007-2014\\ | Integrated Plastic Surgery at Weill Cornell - 2007-2014\\ | ||
| Fellowship in Hand at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) - 2015\\ | Fellowship in Hand at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) - 2015\\ | ||
| - | Denver Health - 2015 - \\ | + | Denver Health - 2015 - Forever |
| [[https:// | [[https:// | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| ===== Hand ===== | ===== Hand ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Flexor Tendon Repair (Zones 1 and 2) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: | ||
| + | 1. Crush injury to hand. | ||
| + | 2. Complete transection of the flexor digitorum profundus, zone 2, right long | ||
| + | finger. | ||
| + | 3. One slip, complete transection of flexor digitorum superficialis, | ||
| + | right long finger. | ||
| + | 4. A 90% transection FDP to index finger, zone 1. | ||
| + | 5. Laceration to ring finger and small finger volar aspect. | ||
| + | |||
| + | PROCEDURES: | ||
| + | 1. Washout and excisional debridement of crush wound to right hand index finger, | ||
| + | long, ring, and small fingers. | ||
| + | 2. Repair of FDP tendon, right long finger, zone 2. | ||
| + | 3. Repair of FDP tendon in zone 1, right index finger. | ||
| + | 4. Closure of simple laceration, right ring finger and small finger. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: | ||
| + | remained on the stretcher. | ||
| + | prominences were padded. | ||
| + | given. | ||
| + | and draped in the usual sterile fashion with a tourniquet on the upper arm. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Surgical pause was performed in accordance with hospital regulations. | ||
| + | upper extremity was elevated and exsanguinated using Esmarch bandage and the | ||
| + | tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. We used a Tupper retractor and removed all the | ||
| + | prior placed sutures and investigated the wounds. | ||
| + | A Bruner incision was used to extend the wound proximally and distally, and it was | ||
| + | noted that the neurovascular bundles were grossly intact, but there was complete | ||
| + | disruption of the FDP tendon in zone 2, as well as one of the slips of the FDS | ||
| + | tendons. | ||
| + | The tendon injury was actually more distal, and as such, we opened Bruner wires | ||
| + | distally to the distal phalanx and located the distal end of the tendon through the | ||
| + | A4-A5 area. The remainder of the A4 pulley needed to be opened. | ||
| + | of the tendon was brought through the A2 and A3 area pulleys. | ||
| + | with copious saline and used a 3-0 Supramid to do a modified Kessler repair of the | ||
| + | FDP tendon. | ||
| + | around the tendon. | ||
| + | full flexion. | ||
| + | remained intact and had not been injured in the accident. | ||
| + | and the Bruner flaps were placed over the tendon. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We turned our attention to the index finger. | ||
| + | excisional debridement was performed of skin and subcutaneous tissue. | ||
| + | with scissors, and the area was 3 x 2 cm. We explored the wound and found a 90% | ||
| + | lacerated FDP tendon in zone 1. As there was not much tendon distally, we elected | ||
| + | to repair this with a suture anchor. | ||
| + | 2-0 suture was drilled and placed into the volar aspect of the distal phalanx. | ||
| + | then used the 2-0 suture to repair the tendon to the distal phalanx, and 6-0 Prolene | ||
| + | was then used for further strength repair at the tendon laceration site. This was | ||
| + | then irrigated. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then did the excisional debridement of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the | ||
| + | long finger. | ||
| + | area. The debridement was skin and subcutaneous tissue and it was done with an | ||
| + | Adson. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then turned our attention to the ring and small fingers. | ||
| + | were explored, tendons were intact in the ring finger and in the small finger. | ||
| + | did not extend into the flexor sheath either. | ||
| + | performed, 1 cm x 0.5 cm for of these lacerations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Irrisept wound irrigation system was used, 500 mL to irrigate all four of the | ||
| + | lacerations. | ||
| + | hand and fingers. | ||
| + | interrupted 4-0 nylon sutures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A dorsal blocking splint was placed after bacitracin, Adaptic, and sterile Webril. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Irrigation with Irrisept 500mL | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: Sterile; arm | ||
| + | |||
| + | Drain: None | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sutures: | ||
| + | - Skin: 4-0 nylon | ||
| + | - FDP zone 2: modified Kessler with 3-0 Supramid, epitendinous with 6-0 Prolene | ||
| + | - FDP zone 1: mini Mitek with 2-0 suture was drilled and placed into volar aspect of distal phalanx, 2-0 suture to repair tendon to distal phalanx, 6-0 prolene to reinforce | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dressing: Bacitracin, Adaptic, Webril, dorsal blocking splint\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: FDP/FDS insertions, zones of injury, Camper' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Elevate LUE, splint care, f/u 1-2 weeks, OT referral for flexor rehab protocol\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Attending Pearls (Learning points/Pimp Questions): N/A\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ==== Metacarpal Nail ==== | ==== Metacarpal Nail ==== | ||
| Line 43: | Line 142: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ==== Dequervain' | ==== Dequervain' | ||
| Line 79: | Line 180: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | + | ==== Wedge Osteotomy of Metacarpal with ORIF ==== | |
| - | ==== ORIF Scaphoid, Volar Approach | + | |
| <WRAP group> | <WRAP group> | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | 1. Wedge Osteotomy of Metacarpal with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | OPERATIVE APPROACH: The patient was identified in the preoperative care area where written consent was reviewed with the patients. The surgical site was marked with a marker. All of her questions were answered and concerns were addressed. The patient was brought back to the operating room by the anesthesia staff. All pressure points were well padded. A surgical time-out was performed per protocol, and 2 grams of Ancef were administered prior to the start of the procedure. General anesthesia was then obtained. A nonsterile tourniquet was placed to the appropriate extremity, which was then prepped and draped in a standard sterile fashion. | ||
| - | Operative Report | + | We began by making a curvilinear incision on the radial aspect of the second metacarpal bony prominence, extending the incision proximally and distally to the base and head of the metacarpal, respectively. A tenotomy was used to dissected down through the subcutaneous tissue to the periosteum. Bipolar electrocautery was used to achieve hemostasis. Significant scar tissue was encountered around the malunion segment of the metacarpal. |
| - | 1.ORIF left scaphoid nonunion with autograft harvested | + | |
| + | Fluoroscopic imaging was used to visualize the second metacarpal and design the wedge osteotomy. | ||
| - | The patient was taken to the the operating room and secured with all bony prominences padded and following patient and procedure confirmation, anesthesia was started. The site was prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. A pre-operative time-out was performed confirming site, laterality, patient | + | Next we drilled a bicortical screw hole most proximal |
| - | + | ||
| - | The arm was elevated and exsanguinated | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | A volar approach | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Attention was turned to the volar distal radius. Pronator quadratus was elevated. A 0.045" | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Attention | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The guidewire was then advanced to the proximal scaphoid. Position of the guidewire was confirmed with fluoroscopy, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The joint capsule was closed | + | |
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 106: | Line 199: | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | Photos\\ | + | Operative |
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Images include dissection down to the malunion, wedge design, more appropriate alignment after wedge resection and lastly plate fixation.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Tourniquet: forearm | ||
| + | Drain: none | ||
| + | Sutures: 4-0 vicryl suture for periosteum/ | ||
| + | Dressing: Xeroform, 4x4 gauze, Volar splint in intrinsic plus | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy should be listed | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Metacarpals are triangular in cross-section. The medial and lateral surfaces meet at the volar ridge, providing attachment to the interossei. These attachments together with the intermetacarpal ligaments proximally and distally help splint fractured bones, making functionally significant malunions of the ring and small metacarpals less common.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Significant extra-articular malunions can cause crossing or scissoring of fingers, pain due to distortion of joints, disturbance of muscle/ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Extra-articular malunions associated with shortening can lead to an extension lag proportional to the degree of shortening.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Intra-articular malunion with a significant step (0.5 mm) or gap (1 mm) may cause joint surface incongruity, | ||
| - | Tourniquet: finger / forearm / arm\\ | + | Post-operative care:\\ |
| - | Drain: Type of drain and placement\\ | + | Volar splint in intrinsic plus positioning.\\ |
| - | Sutures: List all layers\\ | + | If adequate stability is obtained at the time of surgery, remove the postoperative splint 3 to 5 days after surgery and initiate protected motion.\\ |
| - | Dressing: What's preferred?\\ | + | Initiate an early active and active-assisted ROM program.\\ |
| - | Anatomy: Pertinent anatomy | + | \\ |
| + | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Know the difference between an open vs closed wedge osteotomy. More commonly done in ortho in relation to the tibia, but concepts can be applied to other long bones as well.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The wedge should be designed to help better align the long bone along its anatomical central axis.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | In the case of an intra-articular malunion, consider a salvage procedure rather than a repositioning osteotomy in the face of arthrosis.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Accurate plate and screw placement is essential. A screw offset of 1 mm can cause as much as 10 degrees of rotation. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | At least three screw holes are need proximal and distal to the osteotomy.\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | Post-operative care: - discharge to home with some pain medication; elevate; NWB L arm.\\ | + | ==== Palmar Fasciectomy ==== |
| - | - F/U hand clinic 10-14 days for suture removal and thumb spica cast placement.\\ | + | |
| - | - Cast x 6 weeks and then remove for re-evaluation.\\ | + | |
| - | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | + | <WRAP group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | INDICATION: This is a man who had previously been evaluated for Dupuytren' | ||
| + | with the patient. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | OPERATIVE APPROACH: | ||
| + | The patient was identified in the preoperative holding area. Consent was confirmed, the appropriate side was marked as well as the boundaries of the cords. The primary cord was pre-tendinous proximal to the ring finger. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We began our procedure, marking a Brunner' | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then established hemostasis using a bipolar electrocautery. We then, using iris scissors fully excised the pit, which did communicate with the cord. We then irrigated the wound and closed using interrupted 4-0 nylon sutures. We dressed the incision with Xeroform gauze, Webril, and then placed the patient in a resting volar splint. | ||
| + | |||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | FINAL PATHOLOGY: Fibrovascular connect tissue and adipose tissue with focal increased myofibroblasts, | ||
| + | |||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | *** | ||
| + | |||
| ==== A1 Trigger Finger Release ==== | ==== A1 Trigger Finger Release ==== | ||
| Line 475: | Line 625: | ||
| Photos\\ | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| Tourniquet: forearm\\ | Tourniquet: forearm\\ | ||
| Line 640: | Line 792: | ||
| Photos\\ | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| Tourniquet: Forearm tourniquet\\ | Tourniquet: Forearm tourniquet\\ | ||
| Line 646: | Line 799: | ||
| Dressing: xeroform, 4x4 gauze, well padded radial gutter plaster splint\\ | Dressing: xeroform, 4x4 gauze, well padded radial gutter plaster splint\\ | ||
| - | Anatomy: | + | Anatomy: |
| + | Enchondroma most commonly arises in the proximal phalanx or metacarpal when seen in the hand. It can be seen in metaphyseal and epiphyseal regions and is typically confined to the bone. The enchondroma may distend the bone and pathologic fracture may be seen.\\ | ||
| - | Post-operative care: Include restrictions, splints, etc...\\ | + | Post-operative care: Bulky protective dressings are applied and range of motion is initiated at the first dressing change, usually 8 to 10 days postoperatively.\\ |
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Periodic surveillance continues for 3 to 5 years.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| Learning points/Pimp Questions: | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Make the bone window to the lesion two-thirds the greatest dimension of the lesion to allow adequate visualization of the cavity.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Phalanx enchondromas can just have a bulky dressing, but metacarpal fractures usually require splinting for 6 weeks.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | These lesions are similar to giant cell tumors. Remember that these can recur late and metastasize.\\ | ||
| {{: | {{: | ||
| Line 927: | Line 1090: | ||
| Photos\\ | Photos\\ | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| - | Tourniquet: | + | Tourniquet: |
| Drain: 15Fr drain\\ | Drain: 15Fr drain\\ | ||
| - | Sutures: 3-0 PDS, 3-0/4-0 monocryl\\ | + | Sutures: |
| Dressing: Doesn' | Dressing: Doesn' | ||
| - | Anatomy: | + | Anatomy: \\ |
| - | + | Breast Blood Supply: | |
| - | Post-Operative Plan: | + | - Perforating branches of internal mammary artery Lateral thoracic artery |
| + | - Thoracodorsal artery | ||
| + | - Intercostal perforators | ||
| + | - Thoracoacromial artery | ||
| + | - Venous drainage mirrors arterial supply and predominantly to the axilla | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Know the " | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | The pectoralis major muscle has sternocostal, | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | Post-Operative Plan: \\ | ||
| Can dc home or stay the night; admit to breast team\\ | Can dc home or stay the night; admit to breast team\\ | ||
| Ancef x3 doses while in house, keflex on discharge for 10 days or until drains removed.\\ | Ancef x3 doses while in house, keflex on discharge for 10 days or until drains removed.\\ | ||
| Continuous wearing of Compression Bra except while showering\\ | Continuous wearing of Compression Bra except while showering\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| Learning points/Pimp Questions: | Learning points/Pimp Questions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The NAC is innervated by the anterolateral branch of the fourth intercostal nerve. | ||
| + | * Supernumerary nipples and breasts can occur anywhere along the milk line from the axilla to the groin. | ||
| + | * Attenuation of Cooper’s ligaments leads to ptosis and increased breast mobility. | ||
| + | * The IMF is an important structure to preserve. Violation can be difficult to correct. | ||
| + | * Injury to the intercostobrachial nerve results in paresthesias or anesthesia of the upper medial arm. | ||
| + | * Perfect symmetry is rare. | ||
| + | * Medial cleavage is difficult to create if it does not exist in the native breast. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 1029: | Line 1214: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Mangled Hand ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: | ||
| + | 1. Right mangled hand, crush injury | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSES: | ||
| + | 1. Right mangled hand, crush injury involving: index finger, long finger, ring finger, small finger, palm, dorsum of hand | ||
| + | 2. Zone 2 crush injury, multilevel degloving, avulsion, extensive soft tissue damage, dorsal and volar to index finger, long finger, ring finger, small finger, palm, dorsum of hand (Zone VI), with near complete amputation of index finger, long finger, ring finger, small finger | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | PROCEDURES PERFORMED: | ||
| + | 1. Evaluation of right mangled hand, crush injury under anesthesia | ||
| + | 2. Revision amputation of the right index finger at the level of the mid-proximal phalanx, with radial-based V-Y closure | ||
| + | 3. Revision amputation of the right long finger at the level of the mid-proximal phalanx, with radial-based V-Y closure | ||
| + | 4. Revision amputation of the right ring finger at the level of proximal phalanx, with ulnar-based V-Y closure | ||
| + | 5. Revision amputation of the small finger just distal to the MCP joint (base of proximal phalanx preserved), with ulnar-based V-Y closure\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was transported to Operating Room #10 and placed supine on the table with pressure points appropriately padded. A pre-anesthesia time-out was performed. The patient was administered anesthesia without complication. Pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered - Ancef (tetanus status was verified in the ER). The surgical field was prepped and draped in the usual sterile fashion. A final time-out was performed. Anti-embolic compression devices were placed on bilateral lower extremities prior to induction. A Foley catheter was placed and removed at the end of the case. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A sterile upper extremity tourniquet was placed and the fingers were gently wrapped and the right upper extremity was elevated and exsanguinated with an Esmarch, and the tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We began the procedure by evaluating the full extent of her injuries and the viability of the tissues. | ||
| + | |||
| + | RIGHT HAND: | ||
| + | INDEX FINGER: The index finger was found to have a near complete, circumferential degloving of the finger tissue in Zone 2, with a small radial-based soft tissue bridge. The flexor tendons were intact, however, there was injury to the central slip, the extensor tendon, and radial and ulnar neurovascular bundles. There was multi-level crush injury, most severe distally, with displaced, open fracture of P1. Due to the extent of the crush injury, at multiple levels, with poor viability of the soft tissue, and open fracture, it was determined that this would benefit from a revision amputation, with attempt to salvage as much of the surrounding soft tissue, as possible. The neurovascular bundle on the radial side of the digit was therefore carefully preserved, with dissection through Cleland' | ||
| + | |||
| + | (Each finger was evaluated/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | All amputated digits and debrided tissue was sent to pathology, as specimen. The palm was also found to have vertical lacerations extending into Zone 3, with exposed, but intact A1 pulley over the long and ring fingers. The A2 pulley was avulsed on the long, ring, and small fingers. The dorsum of the hand also had puncture wounds over Zone VI, which was inspected and were irrigated thoroughly. A total of 9L of NS was used to irrigate the wounds prior to closure. There were no foreign bodies noted.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient had a postoperative supraclavicular block by the anesthesiology team. Please see separate documentation for additional details.\\ | ||
| + | The patient was awoken from anesthesia and transferred to the PACU in good condition with no apparent complications.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Photos:\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: Forearm / arm\\ | ||
| + | Drain: None\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 4-0 Nylon simple interrupted\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Adaptic with bacitracin ointment over all suture lines, 4x4 gauze, Webril, bulky Jones, bias\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anatomy: Flexor/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Post-operative care: Gentle graduated compression with the bulky Jones/bias placement. Maintain dressings until postoperative appointment in clinic. There is an orthopedic psychology team at Denver Health that specifically cares for patients that are at high risk for PTSD after injury/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Attending Pearls (Learning points/Pimp Questions): Assess viability of tissue and then assess structure-by-structure or spare parts. Bony fixation/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
resident/stephanie_malliaris.1612331718.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/02/03 00:55 by jonathan
