resident:tae_chong
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| resident:tae_chong [2019/09/08 18:32] – [Breast Revision] jonathan | resident:tae_chong [2021/02/22 09:36] (current) – [Facial Artery Dissection] michael | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ===== Introduction ===== | + | ===== Dr. Tae W Chong Introduction ===== |
| - | Dr. Tae Chong. Intro. | + | |
| - | Likes to be called before a complicated case to discuss plan. Strongest suture tech vertical matress best suture tech for everting horizontal matress. Most ischemic stitch horizontal matress. Suturing technique. Deep dermal seed knot down. Pull down with needle driver twice in row. Then opposite and then down again.\\ | + | [[https:// |
| + | [[https:// | ||
| - | Operations below. He very much enjoys asking [[resident:pimp_questions|Pimp Questions]]. | + | Degrees: |
| + | * Bachelor of Science, Biology 8/90 – 6/94, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, | ||
| + | * Doctor of Medicine 8/96 – 6/00, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, | ||
| + | Training: | ||
| + | - General Surgery Internship, Categorical 7/00 – 6/01, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL | ||
| + | - General Surgery Residency, Categorical 7/01 – 6/07, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, | ||
| + | - Research Fellow, Transplantation & Infectious Disease 7/02 - 6/04, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, | ||
| + | - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 7/07 – 6/10, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA | ||
| + | - Associate Program Director Plastic Surgery Residency 2011 - 2015 at UTSW | ||
| - | ===== Operations ===== | + | Research Interests: |
| + | 1. Clinical reconstructive transplantation – evaluating hand transplant outcomes and optimizing medical | ||
| + | management of the recipient.\\ | ||
| + | 2. Surgical Management of Lymphedema\\ | ||
| + | 3. Outcomes in the reconstruction of cancer and post-traumatic defects.\\ | ||
| + | 4. Surgical and adjuvant therapy for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids.\\ | ||
| - | I had a long discussion with the patient regarding the many options for breast reconstruction. | + | Interests and Activities: Marathons, obstacle races, soccer, and martial arts. |
| - | We discussed the risks of implant loss, infection, capsular contracture, | ||
| - | ====Tissue Expander==== | + | =====Operating Reports===== |
| - | Dr. Chong expects you to know: Nipple sparing vs skin sparing and reasoning (e.g. tumor close to nipple, ptotic breast), Base Width, History of radiation or plan for radiation, type of cancer\\ | + | |
| - | Important Notes: Only Dr. Chong opens and handles the tissue expander. “Double” scrub (betadine, dry hands, avaguard) and double gloves. Will switch gloves before handling tissue expander. Dr. Chong does not fill the tissue expander intraoperatively.\\ | + | General Tips:\\ |
| + | [[medical_student: | ||
| - | Placement order: If subpectoral, | ||
| - | Sutures: 3-0, 4-0 monocryl closure, Alloderm 3-0 PDS, drain stitch 3-0 nylon\\ | ||
| - | Irrigation: 1L baci irrigation with cysto tubing\\ | ||
| - | Drain: 15 blake drain placed over pectoralis/ | ||
| - | Dressing: Dermabond, 1 inch steristrips cut over each tail of subcuticular, | ||
| - | Pre-operative markings: Bilateral IMF, meridian, also makes transverse markings at the level of the IMF but midline and lateral as to mark the level of the IMF incase it is obliterated during mastectomy portion, breast footprint. | + | ===== Breast Reconstruction ===== |
| - | In the preoperative suite, I marked | + | Know Base Width in chart and what patient desires for breast size (smaller, same, fuller). |
| + | Scrub: For any implant cases, Chong requires you to first scrub and then use Avvaguard to fill tissue expander, first put it undrr water and suck out sll of the air with filler needle | ||
| - | Operative Report The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped and draped in the standard fashion.The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. Please refer to Dr. ???' s op note for full details of the mastectomy. | ||
| - | At the time that I was called into the OR, the mastectomies had been completed. I began with the {LEFT/ | + | ==== Infected or Exposed Breast Implant ==== |
| - | Hemostasis was then confirmed again and the pocket irrigated with antibiotic saline. One15 blake was placed and sutured with a 3-0 nylon. The skin was then closed with a 3-0 monocryl for the deep dermal layer and a 4-0 running monocryl pull-out suture. | ||
| - | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast. The mastectomy flaps were viable and hemostasis was obtained with bovie electrocautery. I then irrigated the pocket with antibiotic saline. The pectoralis was then elevated and divided at its inferomedial origin. The perforators were controlled with cautery and medium clips. I then irrigated the pocket again with antibiotic saline and we prepped the skin with betadine. Gloves were exchanged and a ??? expander with a???cm BD was placed into the pocket (deflated). The suture tabs were sutured to the chest wall with 3-0 PDS. A sheet of ???? size ? which had been prepared as per manufacturers guidelines was then placed into the wound. It was then inset to the IMF and lateral breast border with a running 3-0 PDS. I then closed the interface between the pectoralis and Alloderm with a 3-0 PDS in a running fashion | ||
| - | Hemostasis was then confirmed again and the pocket irrigated with antibiotic saline. One 15 blake was placed and sutured with a 3-0 nylon. The skin was then closed with a 3-0 monocryl for the deep dermal layer and a 4-0 running monocryl pull-out suture. Biopatches were placed on the drains and dermabond applied to the incisions. She was placed into a surgical bra with fluffs. She was extubated and transferred to recovery in stable condition. | ||
| - | ==== Breast Fat Grafting | + | ==== Latissimus Muscle Flap ==== |
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | Suture: 4-0 chromic simple interrupted to close stab incisions for liposuction and fat grafting.\\ | + | Drains: Donor site: 15 blake\\ |
| - | Dressing: | + | Sutures: Deep dermal 3-0 monocryl, Subcuticular |
| + | Dressing: | ||
| - | I had a long discussion about the risks of the surgery including bleeding, pain, infection, contour deformity, injury | + | An incision was made from the axilla to the back along the axis of the latissimus muscle. |
| - | Operative Report\\ | + | </ |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position after intubation. | + | |
| - | Her donor sites were marked in preop I infiltrated cc of wetting solution after making a small incision with a 11 blade. | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | I then made several stab incisions on the breasts. | + | {{: |
| - | ==== PT Dissection ==== | + | </ |
| - | The medial malleolus was marked and an incision was made just posterior to this and connecting to the wound. Prior to this the tourniquet was insufflated to 250mmHg pressure. Dissection was carried down to the fascia and the fascia was divided with electrocautery. The interval between the superficial and deep posterior compartments was developed. The fascia overlying the PTA in the deep posterior was opened sharply. Dessection was then carried circumferentially around the PTA and veins. Great care was taken to identify the PT nerve and preserve it. Once the PTA and veins were prepared, we then brought the ??? flap into the wound. | + | </ |
| - | ==== Abdominoplasty ==== | ||
| - | Pre-op: Mark the position of the lower incision and the scar\\ | ||
| - | Position: Supine\\ | ||
| - | Prep: "Tuck and roll" | ||
| - | Antibiotics: | ||
| - | Steps: Lower abdominal incision was made with a fresh 10 blade. The dissection was carried down to the fascia with bovie electrocautery. | ||
| - | I then identified the area of diastasis. | + | ==== DIEP ==== |
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | I then placed 2 blake drains (15) with exit points at the lateral incision. | + | Preop Dx: history of breast cancer, s/p mastectomy |
| + | Procedure: 1. | ||
| + | (22 modifier if S code not applicable, muscle preservation | ||
| + | 2. | ||
| + | Drains: 2 drains in the donor site and one drain in each breast\\ | ||
| - | ==== Gracilis Muscle Flap to Perineum ==== | + | **Operative Report**\\ |
| - | Procedure: gracilis muscle flap to perineum, SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography\\ | + | We utilized a two team approach. My partner exposed |
| - | Markings: Frog leg patient. Adductor longus should be bowed out muscle and mark entire course to knee. Mark gracilis 2 finger breadths below | + | |
| - | Drains: 15 blake in thigh and 10 blake in the perineum\\ | + | |
| - | Sutures: Thigh: 3-0 monocryl, 4-0 monocryl, Perineum 3-0 PDS to parachute in muscle, 3-0 vicryl to close perineum (because it is less prickly than PDS)\\ | + | |
| - | Dressings: Dermabond or steristrips depending on if Dr. Chong wants to hide scar for thigh. Tegaderm biopatch for drains, ace wrap for thigh, but don't go too high to compress tunnel. Bacitracin and ABD for perineum | + | |
| - | Restrictions: | + | |
| - | Operative Report | + | Initially, the breast footprint |
| - | The patient | + | |
| - | At the time that I was called into the room the anus had been removed and a small dead space existed. The wound was reassessed and hemostasis obtained | + | Why dissect SIEV 6cm? because it's in the dot phrase. Ribs. Take a rib or otherwise you are doing a vertical anastamosis. Lever up with rouncher. Never point freer towards vessels. Always towards cartilage/ |
| - | A curvilinear incision was made just posterior to the axis of the adductor longus muscle. This was carried down to the muscle fascia and great care was taken to preserve the GSV. The fascia was then opened | + | We then dissected out the vessels on the contralateral side. We identified |
| - | The SPY imaging device | + | During this time we began the flap elevation portion of the operation by making the superior incision. |
| - | The gracilis was then passed into the perineum | + | We then elevated |
| - | The donor leg was then irrigated | + | We then split the fascia above the cephalad perforator |
| - | The patient is to be transferred with the Right leg ADDUcted at all times and a dry abd pad on the perineum | + | We then brought the flap to the contralateral chest and secured it to the chest wall. The IMA vessels and DIEP pedicle vessels were then prepared under the microscope. |
| - | Pimp questions: | + | We then turned our attention |
| - | 1. What superficial vein may you encounter during dissection? Greater saphenous vein | + | |
| - | 2. What is the blood supply | + | |
| - | 3. Describe course of medial femoral circumflex artery? Between adductor magnus | + | |
| - | 4. What nerve supplies | + | |
| + | We then split the fascia above the cephalad perforator and around the remaining perforators. A complex intramuscular dissection was then performed to the pedicle. This dissection took greater than 50% longer than a TRAM or MS TRAM due to the muscle splitting and preservation and the complex intramuscular course of the pedicle. | ||
| - | ==== Gracilis Free Flap ==== | + | We then brought the flap to the contralateral chest and secured it to the chest wall. The IMA vessels and DIEP pedicle vessels were then prepared under the microscope. |
| - | Procedure: | + | |
| - | SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography | + | |
| - | Surgeons: | + | |
| - | Anesthesia: | + | |
| - | Findings: | + | |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| - | Benefits: Vascularized muscle in promoting wound healing, especially in irradiated fields. | + | |
| - | I had a long discussion | + | The rectus fascia defect was then closed |
| - | Informed consent was obtained. | + | At the time of extubation and transfer to recovery she had a doppler signal on the skin and flow coupler. |
| - | Operative Report | ||
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the lithotomy position. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | I began with the SIDE gracilis flap harvest. | ||
| - | ==== Breast Augmentation ==== | + | Bed: **Make sure the bed is able to reflex appropriately |
| - | + | ||
| - | Preop Dx: | + | |
| - | Procedure: | + | |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Brief Clinical History | + | |
| - | @NAME@ is a pleasant @AGE@ female with deflational changes to her breasts who would like more volume and correction of the ptosis. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I marked the position of the lower incision and the scar for the patient in preop. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Operative Report | + | |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I began with the left breast. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | An IMF incision was made (6cm) and beveled superiorly to protect the IMF. The lateral border of the pectoralis was identified and a precise pocket was dissected with retraction and cautery. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The sizers were removed and I prepped the skin with betadine. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Know Base Width in chart and what patient desires for breast size (smaller, same, fuller). | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | 1. Know BW and fill levels as well as radiation | + | |
| - | Radiation will change the nipple position and skin color | + | |
| - | 2. Use old incisions | + | |
| - | 3 Dissect to capsule/ | + | |
| - | 4. Make new incision in capsule that is offset from skin incision (approximately 8mm-1cm superior) | + | |
| - | 5. Cut sutures to TE. Puncture and then take it out. | + | |
| - | 6. Pick your implant. The most important factor is Base-width. Try to match with TE. | + | |
| - | 7. Put the sizer in to check that you like it | + | |
| - | 8. take out the sizer. | + | |
| - | 9. Irrigate the pocket | + | |
| - | 10. betadyne the skin | + | |
| - | 11. Betadyne all instruments from now on | + | |
| - | 12. Put in implant | + | |
| - | 13. Close the capsule, bury knots | + | |
| - | 14. Close the skin 3-0, 4-0 monocryl | + | |
| - | 15. Dermabond incision and steristrip tails. | + | |
| - | 16. Finish one side before | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== BBA, Lipo, Abdominoplasty ==== | + | |
| - | Preop Dx: Breast ptosis, abdominal lipodystrophy, | + | |
| - | Procedure: | + | |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I marked the position of the lower incision and the scar for the patient in preop. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Operative Report | + | |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I began with the left breast. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | An IMF incision was made (6cm) and beveled superiorly to protect the IMF. The lateral border of the pectoralis was identified and a precise pocket was dissected with retraction and cautery. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The sizers were removed and I prepped the skin with betadine. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I then turned my attention to the abodmen. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I then identified the area of diastasis and repair. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I then placed 2 blake drains (15) with exit points at the lateral incision. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== DIEP ==== | + | |
| Drains: 15 blake (2 in abdomen, 1 in each breast)\\ | Drains: 15 blake (2 in abdomen, 1 in each breast)\\ | ||
| Sutures:\\ | Sutures:\\ | ||
| Line 192: | Line 115: | ||
| All Drains: Tegaderm, biopatch\\ | All Drains: Tegaderm, biopatch\\ | ||
| - | Drapes: Blue towels and staples, 4 folding sheets, ioban\\ | + | Drapes: Blue towels and staples, 4 folding sheets, ioban strips\\ |
| - | Preop Dx: history of breast cancer, s/p mastectomy and now with deformity and disproportion\\ | + | Abdominal Dissection: Has said contradictory points in past... |
| - | Procedure: 1. | + | Dissect the DIEV back to the " |
| - | (22 modifier if S code not applicable, muscle preservation and length | + | |
| - | 2. SPY fluorescence imaging of skin perfusion based on perforator dissection\\ | + | |
| - | Drains: 2 drains in the donor site and one drain in each breast\\ | + | |
| - | Inset changed due to implantable doppler: | + | |
| - | Operative Report\\ | ||
| - | We utilized a two team approach. My partner exposed the mammary vessels. | ||
| - | Initially, the breast footprint was created | + | Elevates umbilicus |
| - | We then dissected out the vessels on the contralateral side. We identified the 3rd rib costal cartilage and the pectoralis muscle was split longitudinally to access it. The perichondrium was scored and elevated circumferentially. The entire costal | + | Take a rib or otherwise you are doing a vertical anastamosis. Lever up with rouncher. Never point freer towards vessels. Always towards |
| - | During this time we began the flap elevation portion of the operation by making the superior incision. This was carried to the xiphoid and costal margin. | + | Questions you will be asked: |
| + | Why dissect SIEV 6cm? because it's in the dot phrase. The primary drainage system of the abdomen is the superficial system (not the DIEV), so it' | ||
| - | We then elevated the flap from lateral to medial. The lateral row had x perforators and we then made the midline incision. An oval incision was made around the umbilicus and carried down to the fascia. | + | </WRAP> |
| - | We then split the fascia above the cephalad perforator and around the remaining perforators. A complex intramuscular dissection was then performed to the pedicle. This dissection took greater than 50% longer than a TRAM or MS TRAM due to the muscle splitting and preservation and the complex intramuscular course of the pedicle. This added an additional 2 hours to each side. The x row perforators were then clipped and divided and the remainder of the dissection was then performed.\\ | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | We then brought the flap to the contralateral chest and secured it to the chest wall. The IMA vessels and DIEP pedicle vessels were then prepared under the microscope. | + | Tourniquet: No\\ |
| + | Drain: 15 blake drain\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: | ||
| + | Dressing: dermabond\\ | ||
| - | We then turned our attention to the contralateral flap which was elevated from lateral to medial. The lateral row had x perforators and the medial row had x perforators. We decided to base the flap off the x row due to the size and quality. The x row was clamped with atraumatic clamps. | ||
| - | We then split the fascia above the cephalad perforator and around the remaining perforators. A complex intramuscular dissection was then performed to the pedicle. This dissection took greater than 50% longer than a TRAM or MS TRAM due to the muscle splitting and preservation and the complex intramuscular course of the pedicle. | ||
| - | We then brought the flap to the contralateral chest and secured it to the chest wall. The IMA vessels and DIEP pedicle vessels were then prepared under the microscope. | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| - | The rectus fascia defect was then closed with buried 0 prolene in an interrupted figure of eight fashion. Two 15 blake drains were then placed. | ||
| - | At the time of extubation and transfer to recovery she had a doppler signal on the skin and flow coupler. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Why dissect SIEV 6cm? because it's in the dot phrase. Ribs. Take a rib or otherwise you are doing a vertical anastamosis. Lever up with rouncher. Never point freer towards vessels. Always towards cartilage/ | ||
| ==== IMA Exposure ==== | ==== IMA Exposure ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| A two team approach was used for the operative exposure and flap elevation. | A two team approach was used for the operative exposure and flap elevation. | ||
| Line 234: | Line 155: | ||
| I then identified the 3rd rib costal cartilage and the pectoralis muscle was split longitudinally to access it. The perichondrium was scored and elevated circumferentially. | I then identified the 3rd rib costal cartilage and the pectoralis muscle was split longitudinally to access it. The perichondrium was scored and elevated circumferentially. | ||
| - | ==== DIEP Takeback ==== | + | First I made the flaps. Of course, you go on top of the muscle and you go up to the upper pole of the breast medial to where you're going to do your rib dissection and inferior to the IMF. Don't go too far out laterally or the flap will shift. First divide the muscle over the third rib. You straddled the rib with two fingers and Bovie in between. Get a really big wide dissection and then once you're on the peri-condrium, |
| - | Preop Dx: | + | You'll have to divide |
| - | Procedure: | + | |
| - | Revision of anastomosis | + | |
| - | SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography | + | |
| - | Anesthesia: | + | |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | She was taken emergently | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Operative Report | + | |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The sutures were removed and the flap was de-inset. There was a ??? amount of ??? blood which was irrigated and aspirated. The flap was noted to have ??? affecting | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The SPY imaging device was brought into the field and the patient received ICG as per manufacturers guidelines. The flap perfused well based off the perforators and there was no clinical evidence of venous or arterial compromise. The contrast washed out after 15 minutes confirming venous patency. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The patient was extubated | + | |
| - | Only remove A FEW staples if you think there is venous congestion. Hematoma should | + | These are highly vascular and can bleed so you really got to be vigilant about making sure that you're controlling your field and you follow the intercostal muscles down and lift the peri-condrium that you elevated off of the vessels lateral to medial. You will be bridging vessels from the intercostal artery and vein that will cross over your IMA and IMV. Make sure to control these vessels. |
| + | For the IMA dissection which vessel is lateral and which is medial? The artery is lateral and the vein is medial. This is important because you're going to be dissecting from lateral to medial and then you're going to have to be going under the rib under the sternum even to get to the vein, and this is the one that's much more fragile. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's in a harder place to dissect and it's at more risk for injury at this medial location. The right side is usually bigger. So the right side's easier to dissect origin of the IMA. Origin of IMA is the subclavian artery. The deep inferior epigastric artery origin is the distal external iliac artery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 pds suture\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: No\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ==== DIEP Revision Implants ==== | ==== DIEP Revision Implants ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| Preop Dx: Deformity and disproportion of reconstructed breasts, history of breast cancer reconstruction with DIEP flaps | Preop Dx: Deformity and disproportion of reconstructed breasts, history of breast cancer reconstruction with DIEP flaps | ||
| Procedure: Revision breast reconstruction with fat grafting | Procedure: Revision breast reconstruction with fat grafting | ||
| Line 283: | Line 209: | ||
| She was placed into a surgical bra and binder after dressings were placed on the incisions. | She was placed into a surgical bra and binder after dressings were placed on the incisions. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | ==== Blepharoplasty ==== | + | Tourniquet: No\\ |
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 PDS in an interrupted figure 8 fashion. Capsule closed with 3-0 and then 4-0 monocryl sutures. Incisions were closed with 4-0 chromic sutures.\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond\\ | ||
| - | Preop Dx: Bilateral upper lid dermatochalasis | ||
| - | Procedure: | ||
| - | Anesthesia: | ||
| - | Drains: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | In the preoperative suite, I marked the upper lid crease which was at least 8mm above the ciliary margin and did not extend the markings more medial than the punctum. | + | ==== Tissue Expander Exchange for Implants ==== |
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: ??? breast mastectomy, history of ?\\ | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | Surgeons: | ||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Complications: | ||
| + | Findings: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | Implants: R ???\\ | ||
| + | L ????\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | I also had a discussion with her about the need for capsulotomies for lower pole expansion | ||
| + | |||
| + | We discussed the risks of TE exchange which can include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, disability, need for further surgery, capsular contracture, | ||
| Operative Report | Operative Report | ||
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| - | Corneal protectors with ophthalmic bacitracin were placed. | + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed |
| + | |||
| + | In the preoperative suite I marked the IMF on both sides and the location of the capsulotomies. I began with the ???breast. The prior mastectomy scar was incised and the dissection taken to the capsule | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast. The prior mastectomy scar was incised and the dissection taken to the capsule with bovie cautery. The capsule was divided and the expander was deflated. I then removed the expander. I then placed several implant sizers, and the closest was the ??? implant ??? cc. The lateral breast contour was confirmed | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then irrigated | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dermabond was applied and the patient was placed into a surgical bra. The patient was extubated and transferred to recovery in stable condition. | ||
| - | I then turned my attention to the contralateral | + | Surgical Steps:\\ |
| + | 1. Know BW and fill levels as well as radiation\\ | ||
| + | Radiation will change the nipple position and skin color\\ | ||
| + | 2. Use old incisions\\ | ||
| + | 3 Dissect to capsule/ | ||
| + | 4. Make new incision in capsule that is offset from skin incision (approximately 8mm-1cm superior)\\ | ||
| + | 5. Cut sutures to TE. Puncture and then take it out.\\ | ||
| + | 6. Pick your implant. The most important factor is Base-width. Try to match with TE.\ | ||
| + | 7. Put the sizer in to check that you like it\\ | ||
| + | 8. take out the sizer. \\ | ||
| + | 9. Irrigate the pocket\\ | ||
| + | 10. betadyne the skin\\ | ||
| + | 11. Betadyne all instruments from now on\\ | ||
| + | 12. Put in implant\\ | ||
| + | 13. Close the capsule, bury knots\\ | ||
| + | 14. Close the skin 3-0, 4-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | 15. Dermabond incision and steristrip tails.\\ | ||
| + | 16. Finish one side before starting the other.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 monocryl, running pullout 4-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Top Surgery ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: Gender affirmation surgery, top surgery candidate | ||
| + | Procedure: Bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy and free nipple graft | ||
| + | Prevena incisional wound vacuum placement bilaterally (13cm sponge) | ||
| + | Findings: Breast tissue removed, hemostatic wound bed, healthy dermal bed for graft | ||
| + | Drains: 15 blake drain x2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | female with a history of gender identity disorder who has received counseling and medical approval to initiate gender affirmation surgery. She met all the WPATH guidelines. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The risks of surgery include but are not limited to bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, disability, wound healing problems, loss of free nipple graft, complete loss of sensation of the nipple, contour problems and need for further intervention. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped and draped in the standard fashion. In the preoperative suite the IMF was marked and tapered superolaterally to contour with the lateral pectoral border. This was confirmed with the patient and great care was taken to ensure that the medial extent of the incision was >2cm from the midline. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I began with the left breast tissue. The superior incision was confirmed by tailor tacking. I then used a 20cc syringe plunger as a template for the new NAC (2.5cm in diameter). The nipple was excised full thickness and the breast tissue and excess soft tissue was removed - the nipple graft was placed in a moist lap pad. I then made the superior incision. The superior flap was raised to the chest wall at 1cm of thickness. The breast tissue was completed, the lower incision was made and the breast tissue and skin were passed off to ps then taken off the pectoralis fascia and the dissection carried down past the IMF, obliterating the IMF. The wound was irrigated and bleeding controlled using cautery and surgical clips. A 15 blake drain was placed. The mastectomy flap was then advanced to the lower marking and closed with 3-0 and then 4-0 monocryl sutures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then turned my attention to the contralateral | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then placed the patient in the upright position. The new nipple location was placed at the lateral pectoral border at the 4th intercostal space. Symmetry was confirmed. The template was used to de-epithelialize the nipple graft bed. This was well vascularized and the nipple grafts were sutured with 4-0 chromic suture in an interrupted fashion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 and 4-0 monocryl sutures, 4-0 chromic suture in an interrupted fashion,3-0 nylon\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: bio patch and tegaderm\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Unilateral DIEP ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: ??? breast cancer | ||
| + | Procedure: ??? breast recon with DIEP flaps | ||
| + | Anesthesia: GETA | ||
| + | Drains: 2 drains in the donor site and one drain in each breast | ||
| + | Inset affected by implantable doppler: | ||
| + | |||
| + | female with a history of breast cancer who presents for ??? mastectomy and reconstruction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had a long discussion with her about free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction using abdominal based flaps. The blood supply for the skin and soft tissue is derived from perforators through the rectus abdominis muscle. I will preserve the muscle and limit disability with the perforator dissection. This will have minimal to no functional significance. I outlined the location of the abdominal scars and umbilical scar. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We discussed the need for 24-48 hours of ICU monitoring and the risk of flap loss due to microvascular complications. This occurs 3-5% of the time but if identified early can be salvaged. We also discussed the need to remove costal cartilage for IMA exposure. | ||
| + | She understands that this is a complex operation but that it offers the best opportunity for a natural ptotic result. We also discussed secondary operations like fat grafting and nipple reconstruction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please refer to Dr ???'s note for full details of the mastectomy.Dr Mathes was the co-surgeon for this bilateral free flap due to the complexity and difficulty in DIEP dissection, history of ???, BMI in excess of ???, need for advanced microsurgical expertise and the bilateral nature of the operation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We utilized a two team approach. Dr. Mathes exposed the mammary vessels. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Initially, the breast footprint was created by raising the mastectomy flaps full thickness above the pectoralis - ???. We then identified the 3rd rib costal cartilage and the pectoralis muscle was split longitudinally to access it. The perichondrium was scored and elevated circumferentially. | ||
| + | |||
| + | During this time we began the flap elevation portion of the operation by making the superior incision. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then elevated the flap from lateral to medial starting on the ??? . The lateral row had ??? perforators. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then split the fascia above the cephalad perforator and around the remaining perforators. A complex intramuscular dissection was then performed to the pedicle. This dissection took greater than 50% longer than a TRAM or MS TRAM due to the muscle splitting and preservation and the complex intramuscular course of the pedicle. This added an additional 2 hours to each side. The ??? row perforators were then clipped and divided and the remainder of the dissection | ||
| + | |||
| + | We then brought the flap to the contralateral chest and secured it to the chest wall. The IMA vessels and DIEP pedicle vessels were then prepared under the microscope. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The rectus fascia defect | ||
| + | |||
| + | At the time of extubation and transfer to recovery she had a doppler signal on the skin and flow coupler. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 9-0 nylon suture for the arterial anastomosis, | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | The corneal protectors were removed and the eyes washed with HBSS. The patient was then extuated without complications. | ||
| ==== Direct To Implant ==== | ==== Direct To Implant ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| Preop Dx: BRCA gene test positive, s/p bilateral mastectomy | Preop Dx: BRCA gene test positive, s/p bilateral mastectomy | ||
| Line 333: | Line 409: | ||
| Biopatches were placed on the drains and dermabond applied to the incisions. She was placed into a surgical bra with fluffs. She was extubated and transferred to recovery in stable condition. | Biopatches were placed on the drains and dermabond applied to the incisions. She was placed into a surgical bra with fluffs. She was extubated and transferred to recovery in stable condition. | ||
| - | ==== Facial Artery Dissection ==== | ||
| - | An incision was placed 1.5 cm caudal the the inferior mandibular border along a skin crease. | ||
| - | The superficial cervical fascia was divided sharply and the facial vein was identified. | + | </ |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 PDS, 3-0 mylon, 3-0 monoryl for the deep dermal layer, 4-0 running monocryl pullout suture\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Biopatches, dermabond\\ | ||
| - | ==== Full Thickness Skin Graft ==== | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| - | I discussed with him the risks of full thickness skin graft which include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, loss of skin graft and need for further surgery. | ||
| - | |||
| - | The operation began with preparation of the wound bed. The skin edges were debrided with a fresh 15 blade down to the level of the wound. | ||
| - | This was then transferred to x and an ellipse was designed. | + | ==== DIEP Takeback ==== |
| - | ==== Gastrocnemius Muscle Flap ==== | + | <WRAP Group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | Preop Dx: Composite wound of the proximal tibia with exposed bone | ||
| - | Procedure: | ||
| - | SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography | ||
| - | Anesthesia: | ||
| - | Findings: | ||
| - | Drains: | ||
| - | We had a long discussion regarding the use of gastrocnemius flap transfer for reconstruction. | + | Consent: |
| + | Exploration possible washout\\ | ||
| + | Possible anastamotic revision\\ | ||
| + | Possible saphenous vein harvest | ||
| + | Possible removal | ||
| + | Possible Tissue expander or other salvage procedure\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | Revision of anastomosis\\ | ||
| + | SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography\\ | ||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | |||
| + | She was taken emergently to the OR for flap revision. We discussed flap revision, need for vein graft, and possible cephalic vein takedown. | ||
| + | |||
| Operative Report | Operative Report | ||
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. | + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. |
| + | |||
| + | The sutures were removed and the flap was de-inset. There was a ??? amount of ??? blood which was irrigated and aspirated. The flap was noted to have ??? affecting the venous flow. We then performed ????. The flap was re-inset after a new 15 blake drain was placed. The implantable doppler and the arterial doppler signal were excellent and the skin color was pink. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The SPY imaging device was brought into the field and the patient received ICG as per manufacturers guidelines. The flap perfused well based off the perforators and there was no clinical evidence of venous or arterial compromise. The contrast washed out after 15 minutes confirming venous patency. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was extubated and taken to recovery in stable condition. | ||
| - | I began with debridement of the bony edge and soft tissue to healthy tissue. The unstable skin and scar were excised with a fresh 15 blade down to bone and fascia to bleeding tissue. | + | Only remove A FEW staples if you think there is venous congestion. Hematoma should be handled in OR |
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: | ||
| + | Sutures: No\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: No\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | I made an oblique incision from the caudal end of the wound to the posterior calf near the midline. | ||
| - | The flap was then inset with 3-0 pds suture in an interrupted fashion. | ||
| ==== Gynecomastia ==== | ==== Gynecomastia ==== | ||
| - | Sutures: 3-0, 4-0 monocryl\\ | + | <WRAP group> |
| - | Dressing: 1 inch steri strips, compressive ACE or breast binder\\ | + | <WRAP Half Column> |
| - | Drains: 15 blake round if large resection. Come out lateral and inferior to IMF.\\ | + | |
| - | + | Preop Dx: Symptomatic gynecomastia\\ | |
| - | Preop Dx: Symptomatic gynecomastia | + | Procedure: |
| - | Procedure: | + | Surgeons: Tae Chong, MD\\ |
| - | Surgeons: Tae Chong, MD | + | Findings: |
| - | Findings: | + | Drains: |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| Pt developed symptomatic gynecomastia which is stable, but has not involuted. | Pt developed symptomatic gynecomastia which is stable, but has not involuted. | ||
| Line 395: | Line 496: | ||
| The NAC site was then excised and the nipples delivered. | The NAC site was then excised and the nipples delivered. | ||
| - | ==== Latissimus Muscle Flap ==== | + | What is saucer deformity? By making a peri-areolar deformity can get a saucer deformity. (Like the indent in a saucer plate for tea). |
| - | Drains: Donor site: 15 blake | + | |
| - | Sutures: Deep dermal 3-0 monocryl, Subcuticular 4-0 monocryl | + | |
| - | Dressing: Donor site: Prevena Vac | + | |
| - | An incision was made from the axilla to the back along the axis of the latissimus muscle. | + | </ |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | ==== Lymphatico venous bypass ==== | + | Tourniquet: No\\ |
| + | Sutures: 4-0 and 5-0 monocryl sutures, 3-0, 4-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: 1 inch steri strips, compressive ACE or breast binder\\ | ||
| + | Drains: 15 blake round if large resection. Come out lateral and inferior to IMF.\\ | ||
| - | Preop Dx: Lymphedema of the arm | + | </ |
| - | Procedure: | + | </ |
| - | Lymphatico venous anastomosis x - 22 modifier, complex due to size of vessels (<1mm) and complex anatomy | + | ==== BBA, Lipo, Abdominoplasty ==== |
| - | Anesthesia: | + | <WRAP Group> |
| - | Findings: | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| - | She understands that lymphaticovenous bypass is not a cure, but a treatment adjunct. | + | Preop Dx: Breast ptosis, abdominal lipodystrophy, |
| - | The procedure involves decompressing the lympatics into the veins using supermicrosurgery to vessels that are 0.5mm or less. The surgery is complex, but is performed just under the skin and is performed outpatient. | + | Procedure: |
| + | Drains: | ||
| - | The risks include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, need for multiple procedures, scarring, wound healing problems, worsening | + | I marked the position |
| Operative Report | Operative Report | ||
| The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| - | I injected 0.1ml of ICG into each webspace and in the wrist and forearm. | + | I began with the left breast. |
| - | I then wrapped the arm loosely with an esmarch | + | An IMF incision was made (6cm) and beveled superiorly to protect |
| - | I then made a small venotomy after placeing microvascular clamps. | + | The sizers were removed and I prepped the skin with betadine. |
| - | The arm was placed | + | I then turned my attention to the abodmen. |
| - | After this was done the wound was irrigated and hemostasis was obtained. | + | |
| + | I then identified the area of diastasis and repair. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then placed 2 blake drains (15) with exit points at the lateral incision. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: SFS with 2-0 vicryl in an interrupted fashion, 3-0 and then 4-0 monocryl suture, 4-0 monocryl deep dermal sutures\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Breast Augmentation ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: Breast ptosis, hypomastia | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Brief Clinical History | ||
| + | @NAME@ is a pleasant @AGE@ female with deflational changes to her breasts who would like more volume and correction of the ptosis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I marked the position of the lower incision and the scar for the patient in preop. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I began with the left breast. | ||
| + | |||
| + | An IMF incision was made (6cm) and beveled superiorly to protect the IMF. The lateral border of the pectoralis was identified and a precise pocket was dissected with retraction and cautery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The sizers were removed and I prepped the skin with betadine. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Know Base Width in chart and what patient desires for breast size (smaller, same, fuller). | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 PDS in an interrupted fashion, 3-0 and then 4-0 monocryl sutures.\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====Tissue Expander==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the preoperative suite, I marked the IMF and the breast footprint | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report\\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction | ||
| + | |||
| + | At the time that I was called into the OR, the mastectomies had been completed. I began with the first side - the mastectomy flaps were viable and hemostasis was obtained with bovie electrocautery. I then irrigated the pocket with antibiotic saline. The pectoralis muscle was then elevated and divided at its inferomedial origin. The perforators were controlled with cautery and medium clips. I then irrigated the pocket again with antibiotic saline and we prepped the skin with betadine. Gloves were exchanged and the appropriate base diameter expander was placed into the pocket (deflated). The suture tabs were sutured to the chest wall with 3-0 PDS. A sheet of alloderm which had been prepared as per manufacturers guidelines was then placed into the wound. It was then inset to the IMF and lateral breast border with a running 3-0 PDS. I then closed the interface between the pectoralis and Alloderm with a 3-0 PDS in a running fashion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hemostasis was then confirmed again and the pocket | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast. The mastectomy flaps were viable | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hemostasis was then confirmed again and the pocket irrigated with antibiotic saline. One 15 blake was placed and sutured with a 3-0 nylon. The skin was then closed with a 3-0 monocryl for the deep dermal layer and a 4-0 running monocryl pull-out suture. Biopatches were placed on the drains and dermabond applied to the incisions. She was placed into a surgical bra with fluffs. She was extubated and transferred to recovery in stable condition. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dr. Chong expects you to know: Nipple sparing vs skin sparing and reasoning (e.g. tumor close to nipple, ptotic breast), Base Width, History of radiation or plan for radiation, type of cancer\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Important Notes: Only Dr. Chong opens and handles the tissue expander. “Double” scrub (betadine, dry hands, avaguard) and double gloves. Will switch gloves before handling tissue expander. Dr. Chong does not fill the tissue expander intraoperatively.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Placement order: If subpectoral, | ||
| + | Irrigation: 1L baci irrigation with cysto tubing\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pre-operative markings: Bilateral IMF, meridian, also makes transverse markings at the level of the IMF but midline and lateral as to mark the level of the IMF incase it is obliterated during mastectomy portion, breast footprint. | ||
| + | |||
| + | To place alloderm correctly, stuff in the piece under the pectoralis muscle and then pull it down. Usually will SPY case when sub-pectoral placement of TE.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | To fill tissue expander, first put it under water and suck out all of the air with filler needle with vac suction. Don't forget to make the fold in TE so it doesn' | ||
| + | Dr. Chong likes using high profile TE which have 3 bladders and preferentially fill the lower pole\\ | ||
| + | roll TE like a joint place the TE and then fit the alloderm in after it is set\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | For dissection of lifting pectoralis major off chest wall, lift with browns and go in the fuzzies the pedicle is sitting in that fat, so once you’re over pect minor, get under the fat (the pectoral arterial branch is in that fat) and right on top of pect minor and blunt dissect up.\\ | ||
| + | Bovie25/25 to prevent the thermal injury\\ | ||
| + | Don't go too low or you will go into serratus. Don't start too high or you won' | ||
| + | Dr. Chong tries to make this operation look perfect so he has little to do at the implant exchange and revision operations.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Places TE central tab at breast meridian. (he uses a grid so breast surgeon doesn' | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake drain placed over pectoralis/ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0, 4-0 monocryl closure, Alloderm 3-0 PDS, drain stitch 3-0 nylon\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond, 1 inch steristrips cut over each tail of subcuticular, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Breast Fat Grafting ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had a long discussion about the risks of the surgery including bleeding, pain, infection, contour deformity, injury to the skin, recurrence, wound healing problems, damage to surrounding tissue, and need for further surgery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report\\ | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position after intubation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Her donor sites were marked in preop I infiltrated cc of wetting solution after making a small incision with a 11 blade. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then made several stab incisions on the breasts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Suture: 4-0 chromic simple interrupted to close stab incisions for liposuction and fat grafting.\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Bacitracin and band-aid over each site.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| - | At this time, I decided to hold off on any further bypasses. | ||
| ==== Nipple Reconstruction ==== | ==== Nipple Reconstruction ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| Preop Dx: Deformity and disproportion of reconstructed breasts, history of breast cancer reconstruction. | Preop Dx: Deformity and disproportion of reconstructed breasts, history of breast cancer reconstruction. | ||
| Line 455: | Line 696: | ||
| I then made one stab incision on each breast - between the medial contour deformity and the lateral axillary deformity. | I then made one stab incision on each breast - between the medial contour deformity and the lateral axillary deformity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 4-0 chromics, 3-0, 4-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond, tegaderm\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Oncoplastic Reconstruction ==== | ==== Oncoplastic Reconstruction ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| Preop Dx: History of lumpectomy, deformity of breast | Preop Dx: History of lumpectomy, deformity of breast | ||
| Procedure: oncoplastic reconstruction | Procedure: oncoplastic reconstruction | ||
| Line 479: | Line 737: | ||
| The patient was placed into a sitting position to evaluate the reconstruction. | The patient was placed into a sitting position to evaluate the reconstruction. | ||
| - | ==== Panniculectomy ==== | + | </ |
| - | Preop Dx: Panniculitis, | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | Procedure: | + | |
| - | Anesthesia: | + | |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| - | The risks included bleeding, pain, infections, damage to surrounding tissue, seroma, wound healing problems, need fur further surgery, loss of umbilicus, and unattractive scarring. | + | Tourniquet: No\\ |
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-point suture 2-0 PDS used at the T junction, 3-0 monocryl 4-0 running monocryl, 4-0 monocryl, 5-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Steristrips\\ | ||
| - | Operative Report | ||
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| - | I had marked the patient in the preoperative suite. | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| + | ==== Bilateral Breast Reduction ==== | ||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | ==== Bilateral Breast Reduction ==== | ||
| Preop Dx: Symptomatic macromastia | Preop Dx: Symptomatic macromastia | ||
| Procedure: | Procedure: | ||
| Line 501: | Line 760: | ||
| Complications: | Complications: | ||
| Findings: | Findings: | ||
| - | Drains: | + | Drains: |
| - | + | ||
| - | symptomatic macromastia with shoulder, back, and neck pain which have been refractory to any conservative measures. | + | |
| We had a long discussion regarding the risks, | We had a long discussion regarding the risks, | ||
| Line 517: | Line 774: | ||
| The patient was placed into a sitting position and were symmetric. | The patient was placed into a sitting position and were symmetric. | ||
| - | NAC: de-epi and then make a cross. We do this incase we need to free nipple graft | + | Markings: In order to make the breast triangle, he uses the breast meridian and pulls the breast from one side to the other marking the base of his triangle. This is a sort of pinch test to make sure the breast will close.\\ |
| + | Surgical Steps:\\ | ||
| + | 1. Mark NAC with 38 mm cookie cutter.\\ | ||
| + | 2. Use 15 blade around the NAC to start de-epi.\\ | ||
| + | 3. Breast tourniquet with lap pad (Roll and Twist) and Kocker.\\ | ||
| + | 4. Continue de-epi inferiorly as far as you can go.\\ | ||
| + | 5. Take down tourniquet and use Face Lift scissors to complete de-epi of central/ | ||
| + | 6. Next, focus on the making the pedicle. Start on the medial limb and make your incision and extend a little bit beyond the medial triangle/ | ||
| + | 7. Now focus on the lateral side. Your assistant puts his or her hand in the medial vertical limb and holds the breast while you make the lateral incision down just before pectoralis fascia.\\ | ||
| + | 8. Complete the superior incision to free your pedicle **without undermining the pedicle**.\\ | ||
| + | 9. Cut out your medial and lateral wings. Cut straight and don't get in the wrong plane. Don't double cut. Don't disrupt the IMF. //The trick is to HOLD the tissue but not HORK up the tissue. This avoids skiving and getting into pectoralis fascia.// | ||
| + | 10. The new triangle where the NAC will be delivered is excised. This is the only part where he skives and digs in to thin out the area so the NAC will not look retracted.\\ | ||
| + | 11. All your tissue has been excised and now you can do the three point stitch with 0 PDS to set the meridian of the breast. Through the skin at the IMF (at merdidian), deep dermal buried through medial and lateral wings and back through IMF. Tie the knot on the skin.\\ | ||
| + | 12. Staple the breast. Closure: 3-0, 4-0 monocryl for horizontal portion. 3-0 ONLY for vertical portion. (ie no subcuticular for vertical portion for virgin BBR)\\ | ||
| + | 13. Mark NAC with 38 mm cookie cutter. De-ep and do cross for bail out grafting backup option. Deliver the NAC by touching adjacent dermis and avoid handling NAC itself.\\ | ||
| + | 14. Staple at 12, 3, 6, 9 and then staples in between. Close with 4-0, 5-0 monocryl.\\ | ||
| + | 15. Dressing is 1 inch steri-strips except over three point stitch which gets a little bacitracin. ABDs/Bra.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Dressing: Baci over Tri-stitch and steri-strips over the rest.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marking and Sizing the Nipple\\ | ||
| + | Sit patient up once all incisions are stapled closed. Mark nipple position at area of greatest projection. Lie the patient back flat. Chong DOES NOT remove the staples and remark the nipple. De-epithelialize the skin within the circle and then cruciate the dermis. Pull nipple through and secure with interrupted 4-0 monocryl and then running 5-0 monocryl. ***Chong does not run a 4-0 monocryl along the vertical limb of the wise pattern. He only closes this part with interrupted 3-0 sutures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | NAC: de-epi and then make a cross. We do this incase we need to free nipple graft\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. What are indications for surgery? symptomatic macromastia with shoulder, back, and neck pain which have been refractory to any conservative measures.\\ | ||
| + | 2. Why does Dr. Chong prefer the WISE pattern? | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 monocryl, 4-0 running monocryl, 4-0 monocryl, 5-0 monocryl, running 5-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond, Baci over tri-stitich, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ==== Breast Revision ==== | ==== Breast Revision ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| Preop Dx: Deformity and disproportion of reconstructed breasts, history of breast cancer reconstruction | Preop Dx: Deformity and disproportion of reconstructed breasts, history of breast cancer reconstruction | ||
| Procedure: | Procedure: | ||
| Line 548: | Line 850: | ||
| Fat Grafting -> ABX course | Fat Grafting -> ABX course | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 4.0 chromic sutures, 3-0 moncryl for the deep dermal layer and 4-0 monocryl for the superficial layer, 3-0 and 4-0 monocryl sutures\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Aesthetics ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Blepharoplasty ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: Bilateral upper lid dermatochalasis\\ | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | In the preoperative suite, I marked the upper lid crease which was at least 8mm above the ciliary margin and did not extend the markings more medial than the punctum. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Corneal protectors with ophthalmic bacitracin were placed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then turned my attention to the contralateral lid. Using a fresh 15 blade the skin was incised and removed taking great care to preserve the orbicularis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The corneal protectors were removed and the eyes washed with HBSS. The patient was then extuated without complications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 6-0 prolene sutures \\ | ||
| + | Dressing: No\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Panniculectomy ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: Panniculitis, | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The risks included bleeding, pain, infections, damage to surrounding tissue, seroma, wound healing problems, need fur further surgery, loss of umbilicus, and unattractive scarring. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had marked the patient in the preoperative suite. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 2-0 vicryl followed by a 3-0 monocryl for the deep dermal layer, 4-0 monocryl\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: ???\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Abdominoplasty ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pre-op: Mark the position of the lower incision and the scar\\ | ||
| + | Position: Supine\\ | ||
| + | Prep: "Tuck and roll" | ||
| + | Antibiotics: | ||
| + | Steps: Lower abdominal incision was made with a fresh 10 blade. The dissection was carried down to the fascia with bovie electrocautery. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then identified the area of diastasis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then placed 2 blake drains (15) with exit points at the lateral incision. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 2-0 vicryl in an interrupted fashion, 3-0 and 4.0 monocryl suture, 4-0 monocryl deep dermal sutures\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Other Microsurgery ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== PT Dissection ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The medial malleolus was marked and an incision was made just posterior to this and connecting to the wound. Prior to this the tourniquet was insufflated to 250mmHg pressure. Dissection was carried down to the fascia and the fascia was divided with electrocautery. The interval between the superficial and deep posterior compartments was developed. The fascia overlying the PTA in the deep posterior was opened sharply. Dessection was then carried circumferentially around the PTA and veins. Great care was taken to identify the PT nerve and preserve it. Once the PTA and veins were prepared, we then brought the ??? flap into the wound. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== STA Dissection ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The STA was chosen based on the donor site location and prior scars. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Facial Artery Dissection ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <WRAP Half Column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | An incision was placed 1.5 cm caudal the the inferior mandibular border along a skin crease. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The superficial cervical fascia was divided sharply and the facial vein was identified. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Technique: | ||
| + | Incision: 1 finger breadth inferior to mandible anterior to masseter\\ | ||
| + | Divide platysma\\ | ||
| + | Deep fascia (bluntly)\\ | ||
| + | Node of Star - submandibular lymph node which lies superficial to facial artery at the masseter\\ | ||
| + | Marginal mandibular nerve will be superior to the incision\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Gracilis Muscle Flap to Perineum ==== | ||
| + | <WRAP group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report:\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the lithotomy position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped and draped in the standard fashion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | At the time that I was called into the room the anus had been removed and a small dead space existed. The wound was reassessed and hemostasis obtained with cautery and surgical clips. I then turned my attention to the harvest of the gracilis muscle. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A curvilinear incision was made just posterior to the axis of the adductor longus muscle. This was carried down to the muscle fascia and great care was taken to preserve the GSV. The fascia was then opened and the gracilis muscle was identified. This was taken to the insertion and divided with cautery. The branches from the SFA were controlled with surgical clips and divided. The flap was then raised from proximal to distal. I then identified the skin perforator and this was divided. The pedicle was seen just deep to this and the dissection was stopped. I then made a tunnel to the perineum in the subcutaneous plane. Tunnel is appoximately 3 chong fingers in width. He also divides the SFS to prevent bands that would compress the pedicle. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The SPY imaging device was brought into the field and the patient received ICG as per manufacturers guidelines. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The gracilis was then passed into the perineum and inset into the perineal dead space. It was inset circumferentially with 3-0 pds sutures. The superficial fascia and muscle were then reapproximated with a 3-0 pds. The skin was then closed with 3-0 pds in an interrupted fashion. A 10 blake drain was placed into the perineum. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The donor leg was then irrigated and hemostasis confirmed. A 15 blake drain was placed and the deep dermal layer was closed with 3-0 monocryl. The skin was then reapproximated with 4-0 monocryl. The wound was dressed with dermabond. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procedure: gracilis muscle flap to perineum, SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography\\ | ||
| + | Markings: Frog leg patient. Adductor longus should be bowed out muscle and mark entire course to knee. Mark gracilis 2 finger breadths below\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | The patient is to be transferred with the Right leg ADDUcted at all times and a dry abd pad on the perineum and sacrum at all times (changed qid).\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drains: 15 blake in thigh and 10 blake in the perineum\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: Thigh: 3-0 monocryl, 4-0 monocryl, Perineum 3-0 PDS to parachute in muscle, 3-0 vicryl to close perineum (because it is less prickly than PDS)\\ | ||
| + | Dressings: Dermabond or steristrips depending on if Dr. Chong wants to hide scar for thigh. Tegaderm biopatch for drains, ace wrap for thigh, but don't go too high to compress tunnel. Bacitracin and ABD for perineum\\ | ||
| + | Restrictions: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Questions you will be asked:\\ | ||
| + | 1. What superficial vein may you encounter during dissection? Greater saphenous vein\\ | ||
| + | 2. What is the blood supply to the gracilis muscle? It is a type II muscle flap. Dominant pedicle is branch of medial femoral circumflex artery. It cannot survive off SFA perforators. Pedicle AND skin perforator approximately 10 cm from pubic symphsis.\\ | ||
| + | 3. Describe course of medial femoral circumflex artery? Between adductor magnus and longus.\\ | ||
| + | 4. What nerve supplies the gracilis muscle? anterior branch of obturator.\\ | ||
| + | 5. What is the Origin of the gracilis muscle? The pubic symphysis and the inferior pubic ramus.\\ | ||
| + | 6. What is the Insertion of the gracilis muscle? Medial surface of the tibia via the Pes Anserinus "goose foot" | ||
| + | 7. What other muscles insert at the pes anserinus? sartorius, gracilis, semitendinosus.\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Gracilis Free Flap ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography | ||
| + | Surgeons: | ||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Findings: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | Benefits: Vascularized muscle in promoting wound healing, especially in irradiated fields. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I had a long discussion with the patient about the goals of reconstruction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Informed consent was obtained. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the lithotomy position. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I began with the SIDE gracilis flap harvest. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 monocryl deep dermals followed by a 4-0 monocryl subcuticular suture\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Dermabond, ace bandage\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Gastrocnemius Muscle Flap ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: Composite wound of the proximal tibia with exposed bone | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | SPY indocyanine green fluorescence angiography | ||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Findings: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | |||
| + | We had a long discussion regarding the use of gastrocnemius flap transfer for reconstruction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I began with debridement of the bony edge and soft tissue to healthy tissue. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I made an oblique incision from the caudal end of the wound to the posterior calf near the midline. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The flap was then inset with 3-0 pds suture in an interrupted fashion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3.0 pds suture, 2-0 mylon, 4-0 nylon suture, 4-0 chromic\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: bio occlusive, bacitracin and adaptic\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Lymphatico venous bypass ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Preop Dx: Lymphedema of the arm | ||
| + | Procedure: | ||
| + | Lymphatico venous anastomosis x - 22 modifier, complex due to size of vessels (<1mm) and complex anatomy | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Findings: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| + | |||
| + | She understands that lymphaticovenous bypass is not a cure, but a treatment adjunct. | ||
| + | The procedure involves decompressing the lympatics into the veins using supermicrosurgery to vessels that are 0.5mm or less. The surgery is complex, but is performed just under the skin and is performed outpatient. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The risks include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, need for multiple procedures, scarring, wound healing problems, worsening of lymphedema, and failure of the bypass. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Operative Report | ||
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I injected 0.1ml of ICG into each webspace and in the wrist and forearm. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then wrapped the arm loosely with an esmarch and gently exsanguinated the arm. A tourniquet was placed to 250mmhg pressure. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I then made a small venotomy after placeing microvascular clamps. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The arm was placed under tourniquet control and another end to side anastomosis was performed to the proximal end of the lymphatic vessel. | ||
| + | After this was done the wound was irrigated and hemostasis was obtained. | ||
| + | |||
| + | At this time, I decided to hold off on any further bypasses. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 11-0 nylon, 4-0 nylon\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: No\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Soleus Muscle Flap ==== | ==== Soleus Muscle Flap ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| Preop Dx: Composite wound of the ? middle tibia with unstable scar and underlying osteomyelitis | Preop Dx: Composite wound of the ? middle tibia with unstable scar and underlying osteomyelitis | ||
| Line 571: | Line 1226: | ||
| The flap was then inset with 3-0 pds suture in an interrupted fashion. | The flap was then inset with 3-0 pds suture in an interrupted fashion. | ||
| - | ==== Split Thickness Skin Graft ==== | + | </ |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | Procedure: | + | Tourniquet: Leg\\ |
| - | Split thickness skin graft to back? cm2 | + | Drain: 10 blake\\ |
| - | ? wound vacuum placement ?cm2 | + | Sutures: 3-0 pds, 2-0 nylon, 4-0 chromic\\ |
| - | Anesthesia: GETA | + | Dressing: bio occlusive, bacitracin and adaptic\\ |
| - | Findings: Clean granulation tissue bed | + | |
| - | Drains: Wound vac | + | |
| - | At the time of surgery the patient had a clean wound and was prepared for a skin graft vs local flap. | ||
| - | I discussed with the patient the risks of split thickness skin graft which include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, loss of skin graft and need for further surgery. | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| - | Operative Report | ||
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| - | The operation began with preparation of the wound bed. The skin edges were debrided with a fresh 15 blade down to the level of the wound. | ||
| - | This was then transferred to his left thigh and a dermatome set at ? one thousandth of an inch thickness was used to obtain a STSG. The skin graft was then meshed at 1:?. It was placed on the wound bed and secured with 4-0 chromic sutures. | ||
| + | ==== Bilateral pectoralis Muscle Flaps ==== | ||
| - | ==== STA Dissection ==== | + | <WRAP Group> |
| - | The STA was chosen based on the donor site location and prior scars. | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Bilateral pectoralis Muscle Flaps ==== | + | |
| Preop Dx: Sternal wound infection | Preop Dx: Sternal wound infection | ||
| Line 634: | Line 1282: | ||
| Strict sternal precuations | Strict sternal precuations | ||
| No heavy lifting" | No heavy lifting" | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 0 PDS sutures in figure of 8 fashion, 2-0 nylon, 3-0 monocryl suture for the deep dermal layer and then 3-0 nylon for the skin\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: No\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Reverse Sural Flap ==== | ==== Reverse Sural Flap ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP Group> | ||
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | |||
| Preop Dx: Composite wound of the ???with exposed hardware and with unstable scar. | Preop Dx: Composite wound of the ???with exposed hardware and with unstable scar. | ||
| Procedure: | Procedure: | ||
| Line 662: | Line 1327: | ||
| The flap was then inset with 3-0 pds suture in an interrupted fashion. | The flap was then inset with 3-0 pds suture in an interrupted fashion. | ||
| - | ==== Tissue Expander ==== | + | </ |
| - | Dr. Chong expects you to know: Nipple sparing vs skin sparing and reasoning (e.g. tumor close to nipple, ptotic breast), Base Width, History of radiation or plan for radiation, type of cancer | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | Important Notes: Only Dr. Chong opens and handles the tissue expander. " | + | Tourniquet: Leg\\ |
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 pds suture,4-0 chromic\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Bio occlusive, bacitracin | ||
| - | Placement order: If subpectoral, | ||
| - | Sutures: 3-0, 4-0 monocryl closure, Alloderm 3-0 PDS | ||
| - | Irrigation: 1L baci irrigation with cysto tubing | ||
| - | Drain: 15 blake drain placed over pectoralis/ | ||
| - | Dressing: Dermabond, 1 inch steristrips cut over each tail of subcuticular, | ||
| - | Pre-operative markings: Bilateral IMF, meridian, also makes transverse markings at the level of the IMF but midline and lateral as to mark the level of the IMF incase it is obliterated during mastectomy portion, breast footprint. | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| - | In the preoperative suite, I marked the IMF and the breast footprint on her chest wall. We also discussed drains. | ||
| - | Operative Report | ||
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. | ||
| - | At the time that I was called into the OR, the mastecomies had been completed. | + | ==== Vertical Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap ==== |
| - | Hemostasis was then confirmed again and the pocket irrigated with antibiotic saline. | + | <WRAP Group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast. | + | Preop Dx: Large perineal wound after resection of ??? |
| + | Procedure: Vertical rectus abdominis flap | ||
| + | SPY fluorescence angiography | ||
| + | EBL: ???cc plastic surgery portion | ||
| + | Findings: Large pelvic exenteration defect, viable VRAM | ||
| + | Drains: Perineal 15 blake | ||
| - | Hemostasis was then confirmed again and the pocket irrigated with antibiotic saline. | + | history of ??? who presents |
| + | I had a long discussion with the patient about the goals of reconstruction. The purpose of utilizing a flap is to bring in well vascularized tissue to promote wound healing. The most appropriate based on the size of the defect and the need to obliterate the pelvis is the vertical rectus abdominis flap. He would also require advancement of local tissue to reduce the extent of the lateral component. The risk of these flaps as with any reconstruction include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, need for drain, donor site numbness, wound healing problems, loss of flap, and need for further surgery. | ||
| - | ==== Tissue Expander Exchange for Implants ==== | + | Operative Report |
| - | Preop Dx: ??? breast mastectomy, history | + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the lithotomy position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction |
| - | Procedure: | + | |
| - | Surgeons: | + | |
| - | Anesthesia: | + | |
| - | Complications: | + | |
| - | Findings: | + | |
| - | Drains: | + | |
| - | Implants: R ??? | + | |
| - | L ???? | + | |
| - | | + | At the time that I was called into the OR, the defect |
| - | I also had a discussion with her about the need for capsulotomies for lower pole expansion | + | I then began the flap elevation of the ??? VRAM. The pedicle was dopplered |
| - | We discussed | + | The SPY imaging device was brought into the field and the patient received ICG as per manufacturers guidelines. |
| - | Operative Report | + | The proximal portion of the skin was de-epithelialized and the flap was passed into the pelvis. The flap passed easily into the perineum with the muscle obliterating the floor of the pelvis. The muscle was inset with 3-0 pds and a 15 blake placed to drain the superficial perineal space. The skin was then inset with 3-0 pds for the deep dermal layer followed by 3-0 pds for the skin. |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped and draped in the standard fashion. | + | </ |
| - | + | <WRAP half column> | |
| - | In the preoperative suite I marked the IMF on both sides and the location of the capsulotomies. I began with the ???breast. The prior mastectomy scar was incised and the dissection taken to the capsule with bovie cautery. The capsule was divided and the expander was deflated. I then removed the expander. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast. The prior mastectomy scar was incised and the dissection taken to the capsule with bovie cautery. The capsule was divided and the expander was deflated. I then removed the expander. I then placed several implant sizers, and the closest was the ??? implant ??? cc. The lateral breast contour was confirmed with palpation. The capsule was temporarily closed and the skin stapled. She was placed into a sitting position to confirm size, shape, and symmetry. The implants were removed. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I then irrigated the pocket copiously with antibiotic irrigation. We exchanged gloves and the skin was reprepped. The implants were then placed into the pocket confirming the orientation. I then closed the capsule with 3-0 PDS in an interrupted fashion. The skin was closed with 3-0 monocryl and then with a running pullout 4-0 monocryl. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Dermabond was applied and the patient was placed into a surgical bra. The patient was extubated and transferred to recovery in stable condition. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Top Surgery ==== | + | |
| - | Preop Dx: Gender affirmation surgery, top surgery candidate | + | |
| - | Procedure: Bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy and free nipple graft | + | |
| - | Prevena incisional wound vacuum placement bilaterally (13cm sponge) | + | |
| - | Findings: Breast tissue removed, hemostatic wound bed, healthy dermal bed for graft | + | |
| - | Drains: 15 blake drain x2 | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | female with a history of gender identity disorder who has received counseling and medical approval to initiate gender affirmation surgery. She met all the WPATH guidelines. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The risks of surgery include but are not limited to bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, disability, wound healing problems, loss of free nipple graft, complete loss of sensation of the nipple, contour problems and need for further intervention. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Operative Report | + | |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped and draped in the standard fashion. In the preoperative suite the IMF was marked and tapered superolaterally to contour with the lateral pectoral border. This was confirmed with the patient and great care was taken to ensure that the medial extent of the incision was >2cm from the midline. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I began with the left breast tissue. The superior incision was confirmed by tailor tacking. I then used a 20cc syringe plunger as a template for the new NAC (2.5cm in diameter). The nipple was excised full thickness and the breast tissue and excess soft tissue was removed - the nipple graft was placed in a moist lap pad. I then made the superior incision. The superior flap was raised to the chest wall at 1cm of thickness. The breast tissue was completed, the lower incision was made and the breast tissue and skin were passed off to ps then taken off the pectoralis fascia and the dissection carried down past the IMF, obliterating the IMF. The wound was irrigated and bleeding controlled using cautery and surgical clips. A 15 blake drain was placed. The mastectomy flap was then advanced to the lower marking and closed with 3-0 and then 4-0 monocryl sutures. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I then turned my attention to the contralateral breast. The superior incision was confirmed by tailor tacking. I then used a 20cc syringe plunger as a template for the new NAC (2.5cm in diameter). The nipple was excised full thickness and the breast tissue and excess soft tissue was removed. The nipple graft was placed in a moist lap pad.I then made the superior incision. The superior flap was raised to the chest wall at 1cm of thickness. The breast tissue was then taken off the pectoralis fascia and the dissection carried down past the IMF, obliterating the IMF. Once this was completed, the lower incision was made and the breast tissue and skin were passed off to pathology. The wound was irrigated and bleeding controlled using cautery and surgical clips. A 15 blake drain was placed. The mastectomy flap was then advanced to the lower marking and closed with 3-0 and then 4-0 monocryl sutures. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | I then placed the patient in the upright position. The new nipple location was placed at the lateral pectoral border at the 4th intercostal space. Symmetry was confirmed. The template was used to de-epithelialize the nipple graft bed. This was well vascularized and the nipple grafts were sutured with 4-0 chromic suture in an interrupted fashion. | + | |
| - | ==== Unilateral DIEP ==== | + | Tourniquet: No\\ |
| + | Drain: 15 blake\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 3-0 pds\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: No\\ | ||
| - | Preop Dx: ??? breast cancer | ||
| - | Procedure: ??? breast recon with DIEP flaps | ||
| - | Anesthesia: GETA | ||
| - | Drains: 2 drains in the donor site and one drain in each breast | ||
| - | Inset affected by implantable doppler: | ||
| - | female with a history of breast cancer who presents for ??? mastectomy and reconstruction. | + | </ |
| + | </ | ||
| - | I had a long discussion with her about free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction using abdominal based flaps. The blood supply for the skin and soft tissue is derived from perforators through the rectus abdominis muscle. I will preserve the muscle and limit disability with the perforator dissection. This will have minimal to no functional significance. I outlined the location of the abdominal scars and umbilical scar. | ||
| - | We discussed the need for 24-48 hours of ICU monitoring and the risk of flap loss due to microvascular complications. This occurs 3-5% of the time but if identified early can be salvaged. We also discussed the need to remove costal cartilage for IMA exposure. | ||
| - | She understands that this is a complex operation but that it offers the best opportunity for a natural ptotic result. We also discussed secondary operations like fat grafting and nipple reconstruction. | ||
| - | Operative Report | + | ==== Split Thickness Skin Graft ==== |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped and draped in the standard fashion. | + | |
| - | Please refer to Dr ???'s note for full details of the mastectomy.Dr Mathes was the co-surgeon for this bilateral free flap due to the complexity and difficulty in DIEP dissection, history of ???, BMI in excess of ???, need for advanced microsurgical expertise and the bilateral nature of the operation. | + | <WRAP Group> |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | We utilized a two team approach. Dr. Mathes exposed the mammary vessels. | ||
| - | Initially, the breast footprint was created by raising the mastectomy flaps full thickness above the pectoralis - ???. We then identified the 3rd rib costal cartilage and the pectoralis muscle was split longitudinally to access it. The perichondrium was scored and elevated circumferentially. | + | Procedure: |
| + | Split thickness skin graft to back? cm2 | ||
| + | ? wound vacuum placement | ||
| + | Anesthesia: | ||
| + | Findings: | ||
| + | Drains: | ||
| - | During this time we began the flap elevation portion | + | At the time of surgery |
| - | We then elevated | + | I discussed with the patient |
| - | We then split the fascia above the cephalad perforator | + | Operative Report |
| + | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the supine position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction | ||
| - | We then brought the flap to the contralateral chest and secured it to the chest wall. The IMA vessels and DIEP pedicle vessels were then prepared under the microscope. | + | The operation began with preparation of the wound bed. The skin edges were debrided |
| - | The rectus fascia defect | + | This was then transferred to his left thigh and a dermatome set at ? one thousandth of an inch thickness |
| - | At the time of extubation and transfer to recovery she had a doppler signal on the skin and flow coupler. | + | </ |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| + | Tourniquet: No\\ | ||
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 4-0 chromic sutures\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Tegaderm, Adaptic, bacitracin\\ | ||
| - | ==== Vertical Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap ==== | ||
| - | Preop Dx: Large perineal wound after resection of ??? | + | </ |
| - | Procedure: Vertical rectus abdominis flap | + | </ |
| - | SPY fluorescence angiography | + | |
| - | EBL: ???cc plastic surgery portion | + | |
| - | Findings: Large pelvic exenteration defect, viable VRAM | + | |
| - | Drains: Perineal 15 blake | + | |
| - | history of ??? who presents for reconstruction after pelvic exenteration. | ||
| - | I had a long discussion with the patient about the goals of reconstruction. The purpose of utilizing a flap is to bring in well vascularized tissue to promote wound healing. The most appropriate based on the size of the defect and the need to obliterate the pelvis is the vertical rectus abdominis flap. He would also require advancement of local tissue to reduce the extent of the lateral component. The risk of these flaps as with any reconstruction include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, need for drain, donor site numbness, wound healing problems, loss of flap, and need for further surgery. | + | ==== Full Thickness Skin Graft ==== |
| - | Operative Report | + | <WRAP Group> |
| - | The patient was brought into the operating room and placed in the lithotomy position. All bony prominences were padded and the SCDs were on and functioning prior to the induction of anesthesia. All lines were obtained and secured and the patient was intubated and sedated as per protocol. The patient received preoperative antibiotics prior to surgical incision. A timeout was performed with the entire team and the patient was then prepped and draped in the standard fashion. | + | <WRAP half column> |
| - | At the time that I was called into the OR, the defect was extensive | + | I discussed with him the risks of full thickness skin graft which include bleeding, pain, infection, damage to surrounding tissue, scarring, asymmetry, loss of skin graft and need for further surgery. |
| + | |||
| + | The operation began with preparation of the wound bed. The skin edges were debrided with a fresh 15 blade down to the level of the wound. The wound was then debrided of excess granulation, | ||
| - | I then began the flap elevation of the ??? VRAM. The pedicle was dopplered | + | This was then transferred to x and an ellipse |
| - | + | ||
| - | The SPY imaging device was brought into the field and the patient received ICG as per manufacturers guidelines. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The proximal portion of the skin was de-epithelialized | + | |
| - | ===== Expectations ===== | + | </ |
| + | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | Consent forms: Ensure that the consent form includes all relevant risk and alternatives of surgery. Or he will not start case and re-consent family member. | + | Tourniquet: No\\ |
| + | Drain: No\\ | ||
| + | Sutures: 4-0 chromic sutures, 3-0 monocryl deep dermal layer followed by 4-0 monocryl suture\\ | ||
| + | Dressing: Adaptic, bacitracin\\ | ||
| - | ===== Plastic Surgery Tables ===== | ||
| - | [[https://docs.google.com/ | + | </WRAP> |
| + | </WRAP> | ||
resident/tae_chong.1567981934.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/09/08 18:32 by jonathan
